--- a/src/ZF/WF.ML Mon May 20 12:45:17 2002 +0200
+++ /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,341 +0,0 @@
-(* Title: ZF/WF.ML
- ID: $Id$
- Author: Tobias Nipkow and Lawrence C Paulson
- Copyright 1998 University of Cambridge
-
-Well-founded Recursion
-
-Derived first for transitive relations, and finally for arbitrary WF relations
-via wf_trancl and trans_trancl.
-
-It is difficult to derive this general case directly, using r^+ instead of
-r. In is_recfun, the two occurrences of the relation must have the same
-form. Inserting r^+ in the_recfun or wftrec yields a recursion rule with
-r^+ -`` {a} instead of r-``{a}. This recursion rule is stronger in
-principle, but harder to use, especially to prove wfrec_eclose_eq in
-epsilon.ML. Expanding out the definition of wftrec in wfrec would yield
-a mess.
-*)
-
-
-(*** Well-founded relations ***)
-
-(** Equivalences between wf and wf_on **)
-
-Goalw [wf_def, wf_on_def] "wf(r) ==> wf[A](r)";
-by (Clarify_tac 1); (*essential for Blast_tac's efficiency*)
-by (Blast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_imp_wf_on";
-
-Goalw [wf_def, wf_on_def] "wf[field(r)](r) ==> wf(r)";
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_on_field_imp_wf";
-
-Goal "wf(r) <-> wf[field(r)](r)";
-by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [wf_imp_wf_on, wf_on_field_imp_wf]) 1);
-qed "wf_iff_wf_on_field";
-
-Goalw [wf_on_def, wf_def] "[| wf[A](r); B<=A |] ==> wf[B](r)";
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_on_subset_A";
-
-Goalw [wf_on_def, wf_def] "[| wf[A](r); s<=r |] ==> wf[A](s)";
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_on_subset_r";
-
-(** Introduction rules for wf_on **)
-
-(*If every non-empty subset of A has an r-minimal element then wf[A](r).*)
-val [prem] = Goalw [wf_on_def, wf_def]
- "[| !!Z u. [| Z<=A; u:Z; ALL x:Z. EX y:Z. <y,x>:r |] ==> False |] \
-\ ==> wf[A](r)";
-by (rtac (equals0I RS disjCI RS allI) 1);
-by (res_inst_tac [ ("Z", "Z") ] prem 1);
-by (ALLGOALS Blast_tac);
-qed "wf_onI";
-
-(*If r allows well-founded induction over A then wf[A](r)
- Premise is equivalent to
- !!B. ALL x:A. (ALL y. <y,x>: r --> y:B) --> x:B ==> A<=B *)
-val [prem] = Goal
- "[| !!y B. [| ALL x:A. (ALL y:A. <y,x>:r --> y:B) --> x:B; y:A |] \
-\ ==> y:B |] \
-\ ==> wf[A](r)";
-by (rtac wf_onI 1);
-by (res_inst_tac [ ("c", "u") ] (prem RS DiffE) 1);
-by (contr_tac 3);
-by (Blast_tac 2);
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_onI2";
-
-
-(** Well-founded Induction **)
-
-(*Consider the least z in domain(r) Un {a} such that P(z) does not hold...*)
-val [major,minor] = Goalw [wf_def]
- "[| wf(r); \
-\ !!x.[| ALL y. <y,x>: r --> P(y) |] ==> P(x) \
-\ |] ==> P(a)";
-by (res_inst_tac [ ("x", "{z:domain(r) Un {a}. ~P(z)}") ] (major RS allE) 1);
-by (etac disjE 1);
-by (blast_tac (claset() addEs [equalityE]) 1);
-by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [domainI]) 1);
-by (blast_tac (claset() addSDs [minor]) 1);
-qed "wf_induct";
-
-(*Perform induction on i, then prove the wf(r) subgoal using prems. *)
-fun wf_ind_tac a prems i =
- EVERY [res_inst_tac [("a",a)] wf_induct i,
- rename_last_tac a ["1"] (i+1),
- ares_tac prems i];
-
-(*The form of this rule is designed to match wfI*)
-val wfr::amem::prems = Goal
- "[| wf(r); a:A; field(r)<=A; \
-\ !!x.[| x: A; ALL y. <y,x>: r --> P(y) |] ==> P(x) \
-\ |] ==> P(a)";
-by (rtac (amem RS rev_mp) 1);
-by (wf_ind_tac "a" [wfr] 1);
-by (rtac impI 1);
-by (eresolve_tac prems 1);
-by (blast_tac (claset() addIs (prems RL [subsetD])) 1);
-qed "wf_induct2";
-
-Goal "field(r Int A*A) <= A";
-by (Blast_tac 1);
-qed "field_Int_square";
-
-val wfr::amem::prems = Goalw [wf_on_def]
- "[| wf[A](r); a:A; \
-\ !!x.[| x: A; ALL y:A. <y,x>: r --> P(y) |] ==> P(x) \
-\ |] ==> P(a)";
-by (rtac ([wfr, amem, field_Int_square] MRS wf_induct2) 1);
-by (REPEAT (ares_tac prems 1));
-by (Blast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_on_induct";
-
-fun wf_on_ind_tac a prems i =
- EVERY [res_inst_tac [("a",a)] wf_on_induct i,
- rename_last_tac a ["1"] (i+2),
- REPEAT (ares_tac prems i)];
-
-(*If r allows well-founded induction then wf(r)*)
-val [subs,indhyp] = Goal
- "[| field(r)<=A; \
-\ !!y B. [| ALL x:A. (ALL y:A. <y,x>:r --> y:B) --> x:B; y:A|] \
-\ ==> y:B |] \
-\ ==> wf(r)";
-by (rtac ([wf_onI2, subs] MRS (wf_on_subset_A RS wf_on_field_imp_wf)) 1);
-by (REPEAT (ares_tac [indhyp] 1));
-qed "wfI";
-
-
-(*** Properties of well-founded relations ***)
-
-Goal "wf(r) ==> <a,a> ~: r";
-by (wf_ind_tac "a" [] 1);
-by (Blast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_not_refl";
-
-Goal "wf(r) ==> ALL x. <a,x>:r --> <x,a> ~: r";
-by (wf_ind_tac "a" [] 1);
-by (Blast_tac 1);
-qed_spec_mp "wf_not_sym";
-
-(* [| wf(r); <a,x> : r; ~P ==> <x,a> : r |] ==> P *)
-bind_thm ("wf_asym", wf_not_sym RS swap);
-
-Goal "[| wf[A](r); a: A |] ==> <a,a> ~: r";
-by (wf_on_ind_tac "a" [] 1);
-by (Blast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_on_not_refl";
-
-Goal "[| wf[A](r); a:A; b:A |] ==> <a,b>:r --> <b,a>~:r";
-by (res_inst_tac [("x","b")] bspec 1);
-by (assume_tac 2);
-by (wf_on_ind_tac "a" [] 1);
-by (Blast_tac 1);
-qed_spec_mp "wf_on_not_sym";
-
-(* [| wf[A](r); ~Z ==> <a,b> : r;
- <b,a> ~: r ==> Z; ~Z ==> a : A; ~Z ==> b : A |] ==> Z *)
-bind_thm ("wf_on_asym", permute_prems 1 2 (cla_make_elim wf_on_not_sym));
-
-(*Needed to prove well_ordI. Could also reason that wf[A](r) means
- wf(r Int A*A); thus wf( (r Int A*A)^+ ) and use wf_not_refl *)
-Goal "[| wf[A](r); <a,b>:r; <b,c>:r; <c,a>:r; a:A; b:A; c:A |] ==> P";
-by (subgoal_tac "ALL y:A. ALL z:A. <a,y>:r --> <y,z>:r --> <z,a>:r --> P" 1);
-by (wf_on_ind_tac "a" [] 2);
-by (Blast_tac 2);
-by (Blast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_on_chain3";
-
-
-(*retains the universal formula for later use!*)
-val bchain_tac = EVERY' [rtac (bspec RS mp), assume_tac, assume_tac ];
-
-(*transitive closure of a WF relation is WF provided A is downwards closed*)
-val [wfr,subs] = goal (the_context ())
- "[| wf[A](r); r-``A <= A |] ==> wf[A](r^+)";
-by (rtac wf_onI2 1);
-by (bchain_tac 1);
-by (eres_inst_tac [("a","y")] (wfr RS wf_on_induct) 1);
-by (cut_facts_tac [subs] 1);
-by (blast_tac (claset() addEs [tranclE]) 1);
-qed "wf_on_trancl";
-
-Goal "wf(r) ==> wf(r^+)";
-by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [wf_iff_wf_on_field]) 1);
-by (rtac (trancl_type RS field_rel_subset RSN (2, wf_on_subset_A)) 1);
-by (etac wf_on_trancl 1);
-by (Blast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_trancl";
-
-
-
-(** r-``{a} is the set of everything under a in r **)
-
-bind_thm ("underI", vimage_singleton_iff RS iffD2);
-bind_thm ("underD", vimage_singleton_iff RS iffD1);
-
-(** is_recfun **)
-
-Goalw [is_recfun_def] "is_recfun(r,a,H,f) ==> f: r-``{a} -> range(f)";
-by (etac ssubst 1);
-by (rtac (lamI RS rangeI RS lam_type) 1);
-by (assume_tac 1);
-qed "is_recfun_type";
-
-val [isrec,rel] = goalw (the_context ()) [is_recfun_def]
- "[| is_recfun(r,a,H,f); <x,a>:r |] ==> f`x = H(x, restrict(f,r-``{x}))";
-by (res_inst_tac [("P", "%x.?t(x) = (?u::i)")] (isrec RS ssubst) 1);
-by (rtac (rel RS underI RS beta) 1);
-qed "apply_recfun";
-
-Goal "[| wf(r); trans(r); is_recfun(r,a,H,f); is_recfun(r,b,H,g) |] \
-\ ==> <x,a>:r --> <x,b>:r --> f`x=g`x";
-by (forw_inst_tac [("f","f")] is_recfun_type 1);
-by (forw_inst_tac [("f","g")] is_recfun_type 1);
-by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [is_recfun_def]) 1);
-by (wf_ind_tac "x" [] 1);
-by (REPEAT (rtac impI 1 ORELSE etac ssubst 1));
-by (asm_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [vimage_singleton_iff, restrict_def]) 1);
-by (res_inst_tac [("t","%z. H(?x,z)")] subst_context 1);
-by (subgoal_tac "ALL y : r-``{x1}. ALL z. <y,z>:f <-> <y,z>:g" 1);
- by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [transD]) 1);
-by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [apply_iff]) 1);
-by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [transD] addIs [sym]) 1);
-qed_spec_mp "is_recfun_equal";
-
-Goal "[| wf(r); trans(r); \
-\ is_recfun(r,a,H,f); is_recfun(r,b,H,g); <b,a>:r |] \
-\ ==> restrict(f, r-``{b}) = g";
-by (forw_inst_tac [("f","f")] is_recfun_type 1);
-by (rtac fun_extension 1);
- by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [transD] addIs [restrict_type2]) 1);
- by (etac is_recfun_type 1);
-by (Asm_full_simp_tac 1);
-by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [transD]
- addIs [is_recfun_equal]) 1);
-qed "is_recfun_cut";
-
-(*** Main Existence Lemma ***)
-
-Goal "[| wf(r); trans(r); is_recfun(r,a,H,f); is_recfun(r,a,H,g) |] ==> f=g";
-by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [fun_extension, is_recfun_type,
- is_recfun_equal]) 1);
-qed "is_recfun_functional";
-
-(*If some f satisfies is_recfun(r,a,H,-) then so does the_recfun(r,a,H) *)
-Goalw [the_recfun_def]
- "[| is_recfun(r,a,H,f); wf(r); trans(r) |] \
-\ ==> is_recfun(r, a, H, the_recfun(r,a,H))";
-by (rtac (ex1I RS theI) 1);
-by (REPEAT (ares_tac [is_recfun_functional] 1));
-qed "is_the_recfun";
-
-Goal "[| wf(r); trans(r) |] ==> is_recfun(r, a, H, the_recfun(r,a,H))";
-by (wf_ind_tac "a" [] 1);
-by (res_inst_tac [("f", "lam y: r-``{a1}. wftrec(r,y,H)")] is_the_recfun 1);
-by (REPEAT (assume_tac 2));
-by (rewrite_goals_tac [is_recfun_def, wftrec_def]);
-(*Applying the substitution: must keep the quantified assumption!!*)
-by (REPEAT (dtac underD 1 ORELSE resolve_tac [refl, lam_cong] 1));
-by (fold_tac [is_recfun_def]);
-by (res_inst_tac [("t","%z. H(?x,z)")] subst_context 1);
-by (rtac fun_extension 1);
- by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [is_recfun_type]) 1);
- by (rtac (lam_type RS restrict_type2) 1);
- by (Blast_tac 1);
- by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [transD]) 1);
-by (ftac (spec RS mp) 1 THEN assume_tac 1);
-by (subgoal_tac "<xa,a1> : r" 1);
-by (dres_inst_tac [("x1","xa")] (spec RS mp) 1 THEN assume_tac 1);
-by (asm_full_simp_tac
- (simpset() addsimps [vimage_singleton_iff, underI RS beta, apply_recfun,
- is_recfun_cut]) 1);
-by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [transD]) 1);
-qed "unfold_the_recfun";
-
-
-(*** Unfolding wftrec ***)
-
-Goal "[| wf(r); trans(r); <b,a>:r |] ==> \
-\ restrict(the_recfun(r,a,H), r-``{b}) = the_recfun(r,b,H)";
-by (REPEAT (ares_tac [is_recfun_cut, unfold_the_recfun] 1));
-qed "the_recfun_cut";
-
-(*NOT SUITABLE FOR REWRITING: it is recursive!*)
-Goalw [wftrec_def]
- "[| wf(r); trans(r) |] ==> \
-\ wftrec(r,a,H) = H(a, lam x: r-``{a}. wftrec(r,x,H))";
-by (stac (rewrite_rule [is_recfun_def] unfold_the_recfun) 1);
-by (ALLGOALS
- (asm_simp_tac
- (simpset() addsimps [vimage_singleton_iff RS iff_sym, the_recfun_cut])));
-qed "wftrec";
-
-(** Removal of the premise trans(r) **)
-
-(*NOT SUITABLE FOR REWRITING: it is recursive!*)
-val [wfr] = goalw (the_context ()) [wfrec_def]
- "wf(r) ==> wfrec(r,a,H) = H(a, lam x:r-``{a}. wfrec(r,x,H))";
-by (stac (wfr RS wf_trancl RS wftrec) 1);
-by (rtac trans_trancl 1);
-by (rtac (vimage_pair_mono RS restrict_lam_eq RS subst_context) 1);
-by (etac r_into_trancl 1);
-by (rtac subset_refl 1);
-qed "wfrec";
-
-(*This form avoids giant explosions in proofs. NOTE USE OF == *)
-val rew::prems = Goal
- "[| !!x. h(x)==wfrec(r,x,H); wf(r) |] ==> \
-\ h(a) = H(a, lam x: r-``{a}. h(x))";
-by (rewtac rew);
-by (REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems@[wfrec]) 1));
-qed "def_wfrec";
-
-val prems = Goal
- "[| wf(r); a:A; field(r)<=A; \
-\ !!x u. [| x: A; u: Pi(r-``{x}, B) |] ==> H(x,u) : B(x) \
-\ |] ==> wfrec(r,a,H) : B(a)";
-by (res_inst_tac [("a","a")] wf_induct2 1);
-by (stac wfrec 4);
-by (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[lam_type]) 1
- ORELSE eresolve_tac [spec RS mp, underD] 1));
-qed "wfrec_type";
-
-
-Goalw [wf_on_def, wfrec_on_def]
- "[| wf[A](r); a: A |] ==> \
-\ wfrec[A](r,a,H) = H(a, lam x: (r-``{a}) Int A. wfrec[A](r,x,H))";
-by (etac (wfrec RS trans) 1);
-by (asm_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [vimage_Int_square, cons_subset_iff]) 1);
-qed "wfrec_on";
-
-(*Minimal-element characterization of well-foundedness*)
-Goalw [wf_def]
- "wf(r) <-> (ALL Q x. x:Q --> (EX z:Q. ALL y. <y,z>:r --> y~:Q))";
-by (Blast_tac 1);
-qed "wf_eq_minimal";
-