summary |
shortlog |
changelog |
graph |
tags |
bookmarks |
branches |
files |
changeset |
raw | gz |
help

author | lcp |

Fri, 15 Apr 1994 18:43:21 +0200 | |

changeset 329 | 92586a978648 |

parent 328 | 2d1b460dbb62 |

child 330 | 2fda15dd1e0f |

penultimate Springer draft

--- a/doc-src/preface.tex Fri Apr 15 18:34:26 1994 +0200 +++ b/doc-src/preface.tex Fri Apr 15 18:43:21 1994 +0200 @@ -2,20 +2,23 @@ \markboth{Preface}{Preface} %or Preface ? \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Preface} -\index{Isabelle!object-logics supported} - Most theorem provers support a fixed logic, such as first-order or equational logic. They bring sophisticated proof procedures to bear upon the conjectured formula. The resolution prover Otter~\cite{wos-bledsoe} is -an impressive example. ALF~\cite{alf}, Coq~\cite{coq} and -Nuprl~\cite{constable86} each support a fixed logic too, but one far -removed from first-order logic. They are explicitly concerned with -computation. A diverse collection of logics --- type theories, process -calculi, $\lambda$-calculi --- may be found in the Computer Science -literature. Such logics require proof support. Few proof procedures are -known for them, but the theorem prover can at least automate routine steps. +an impressive example. -A {\bf generic} theorem prover is one that can support a variety of logics. +{\sc alf}~\cite{alf}, Coq~\cite{coq} and Nuprl~\cite{constable86} each +support a fixed logic too. These are higher-order type theories, +explicitly concerned with computation and capable of expressing +developments in constructive mathematics. They are far removed from +classical first-order logic. + +A diverse collection of logics --- type theories, process calculi, +$\lambda$-calculi --- may be found in the Computer Science literature. +Such logics require proof support. Few proof procedures are known for +them, but the theorem prover can at least automate routine steps. + +A {\bf generic} theorem prover is one that supports a variety of logics. Some generic provers are noteworthy for their user interfaces \cite{dawson90,mural,sawamura92}. Most of them work by implementing a syntactic framework that can express typical inference rules. Isabelle's @@ -35,7 +38,7 @@ conduct single-step proofs, use Isabelle's built-in proof procedures, or develop new proof procedures using tactics and tacticals. -Isabelle's meta-logic is higher-order, based on the typed +Isabelle's meta-logic is higher-order, based on the simply typed $\lambda$-calculus. So resolution cannot use ordinary unification, but higher-order unification~\cite{huet75}. This complicated procedure gives Isabelle strong support for many logical formalisms involving variable @@ -45,9 +48,8 @@ These include first-order logic (intuitionistic and classical), the sequent calculus, higher-order logic, Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory~\cite{suppes72}, a version of Constructive Type Theory~\cite{nordstrom90}, several modal -logics, and a Logic for Computable Functions. Several experimental -logics are also available, such a term assignment calculus for linear -logic. +logics, and a Logic for Computable Functions. Several experimental logics +are being developed, such as linear logic. \centerline{\epsfbox{Isa-logics.eps}} @@ -77,8 +79,8 @@ should use it to locate facts quickly. \item {\em Isabelle's Object-Logics\/} describes the various logics - distributed with Isabelle. Its final chapter explains how to define new - logics. The other chapters are intended for reference only. + distributed with Isabelle. The chapters are intended for reference only; + they overlap somewhat so that each chapter can be read in isolation. \end{itemize} This book should not be read from start to finish. Instead you might read a couple of chapters from {\em Introduction to Isabelle}, then try some @@ -88,7 +90,7 @@ -\section*{Releases of Isabelle}\index{Isabelle!release history} +\section*{Releases of Isabelle} Isabelle was first distributed in 1986. The 1987 version introduced a higher-order meta-logic with an improved treatment of quantifiers. The 1988 version added limited polymorphism and support for natural deduction. @@ -125,13 +127,15 @@ Nipkow and his students wrote much of the documentation underlying this book. Nipkow wrote the first versions of \S\ref{sec:defining-theories}, -\S\ref{sec:ref-defining-theories}, Chap.\ts\ref{simp-chap}, -Chap.\ts\ref{Defining-Logics} and App.\ts\ref{app:TheorySyntax}\@. Carsten +\S\ref{sec:ref-defining-theories}, Chap.\ts\ref{Defining-Logics}, +Chap.\ts\ref{simp-chap} and App.\ts\ref{app:TheorySyntax}\@. Carsten Clasohm contributed to Chap.\ts\ref{theories}. Markus Wenzel contributed -to Chap.\ts\ref{Defining-Logics}. +to Chap.\ts\ref{chap:syntax}. Nipkow also provided the quotation at +the front. -David Aspinall, Sara Kalvala, Ina Kraan, Zhenyu Qian, Norbert V{\"o}lker and -Markus Wenzel suggested changes and corrections to the documentation. +David Aspinall, Sara Kalvala, Ina Kraan, Chris Owens, Zhenyu Qian, Norbert +V{\"o}lker and Markus Wenzel suggested changes and corrections to the +documentation. Martin Coen, Rajeev Gor\'e, Philippe de Groote and Philippe No\"el helped to develop Isabelle's standard object-logics. David Aspinall performed @@ -142,6 +146,3 @@ The research has been funded by numerous SERC grants dating from the Alvey programme (grants GR/E0355.7, GR/G53279, GR/H40570) and by ESPRIT (projects 3245: Logical Frameworks and 6453: Types). - - -\index{ML}