--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Reflected_Multivariate_Polynomial.thy Tue Jul 30 22:43:11 2013 +0200
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Reflected_Multivariate_Polynomial.thy Tue Jul 30 23:16:17 2013 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
imports Complex_Main "~~/src/HOL/Library/Abstract_Rat" Polynomial_List
begin
-subsection{* Datatype of polynomial expressions *}
+subsection{* Datatype of polynomial expressions *}
datatype poly = C Num| Bound nat| Add poly poly|Sub poly poly
| Mul poly poly| Neg poly| Pw poly nat| CN poly nat poly
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
| "polybound0 (Bound n) = (n>0)"
| "polybound0 (Neg a) = polybound0 a"
| "polybound0 (Add a b) = (polybound0 a \<and> polybound0 b)"
-| "polybound0 (Sub a b) = (polybound0 a \<and> polybound0 b)"
+| "polybound0 (Sub a b) = (polybound0 a \<and> polybound0 b)"
| "polybound0 (Mul a b) = (polybound0 a \<and> polybound0 b)"
| "polybound0 (Pw p n) = (polybound0 p)"
| "polybound0 (CN c n p) = (n \<noteq> 0 \<and> polybound0 c \<and> polybound0 p)"
@@ -47,13 +47,13 @@
| "polysubst0 t (Bound n) = (if n=0 then t else Bound n)"
| "polysubst0 t (Neg a) = Neg (polysubst0 t a)"
| "polysubst0 t (Add a b) = Add (polysubst0 t a) (polysubst0 t b)"
-| "polysubst0 t (Sub a b) = Sub (polysubst0 t a) (polysubst0 t b)"
+| "polysubst0 t (Sub a b) = Sub (polysubst0 t a) (polysubst0 t b)"
| "polysubst0 t (Mul a b) = Mul (polysubst0 t a) (polysubst0 t b)"
| "polysubst0 t (Pw p n) = Pw (polysubst0 t p) n"
| "polysubst0 t (CN c n p) = (if n=0 then Add (polysubst0 t c) (Mul t (polysubst0 t p))
else CN (polysubst0 t c) n (polysubst0 t p))"
-fun decrpoly:: "poly \<Rightarrow> poly"
+fun decrpoly:: "poly \<Rightarrow> poly"
where
"decrpoly (Bound n) = Bound (n - 1)"
| "decrpoly (Neg a) = Neg (decrpoly a)"
@@ -117,12 +117,12 @@
fun polyadd :: "poly \<Rightarrow> poly \<Rightarrow> poly" (infixl "+\<^sub>p" 60)
where
"polyadd (C c) (C c') = C (c+\<^sub>Nc')"
-| "polyadd (C c) (CN c' n' p') = CN (polyadd (C c) c') n' p'"
+| "polyadd (C c) (CN c' n' p') = CN (polyadd (C c) c') n' p'"
| "polyadd (CN c n p) (C c') = CN (polyadd c (C c')) n p"
| "polyadd (CN c n p) (CN c' n' p') =
(if n < n' then CN (polyadd c (CN c' n' p')) n p
else if n'<n then CN (polyadd (CN c n p) c') n' p'
- else (let cc' = polyadd c c' ;
+ else (let cc' = polyadd c c' ;
pp' = polyadd p p'
in (if pp' = 0\<^sub>p then cc' else CN cc' n pp')))"
| "polyadd a b = Add a b"
@@ -140,13 +140,13 @@
fun polymul :: "poly \<Rightarrow> poly \<Rightarrow> poly" (infixl "*\<^sub>p" 60)
where
"polymul (C c) (C c') = C (c*\<^sub>Nc')"
-| "polymul (C c) (CN c' n' p') =
+| "polymul (C c) (CN c' n' p') =
(if c = 0\<^sub>N then 0\<^sub>p else CN (polymul (C c) c') n' (polymul (C c) p'))"
-| "polymul (CN c n p) (C c') =
+| "polymul (CN c n p) (C c') =
(if c' = 0\<^sub>N then 0\<^sub>p else CN (polymul c (C c')) n (polymul p (C c')))"
-| "polymul (CN c n p) (CN c' n' p') =
+| "polymul (CN c n p) (CN c' n' p') =
(if n<n' then CN (polymul c (CN c' n' p')) n (polymul p (CN c' n' p'))
- else if n' < n
+ else if n' < n
then CN (polymul (CN c n p) c') n' (polymul (CN c n p) p')
else polyadd (polymul (CN c n p) c') (CN 0\<^sub>p n' (polymul (CN c n p) p')))"
| "polymul a b = Mul a b"
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
fun polypow :: "nat \<Rightarrow> poly \<Rightarrow> poly"
where
"polypow 0 = (\<lambda>p. (1)\<^sub>p)"
-| "polypow n = (\<lambda>p. let q = polypow (n div 2) p ; d = polymul q q in
+| "polypow n = (\<lambda>p. let q = polypow (n div 2) p ; d = polymul q q in
if even n then d else polymul p d)"
abbreviation poly_pow :: "poly \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> poly" (infixl "^\<^sub>p" 60)
@@ -196,13 +196,15 @@
partial_function (tailrec) polydivide_aux :: "poly \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> poly \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> poly \<Rightarrow> nat \<times> poly"
where
- "polydivide_aux a n p k s =
+ "polydivide_aux a n p k s =
(if s = 0\<^sub>p then (k,s)
- else (let b = head s; m = degree s in
- (if m < n then (k,s) else
- (let p'= funpow (m - n) shift1 p in
- (if a = b then polydivide_aux a n p k (s -\<^sub>p p')
- else polydivide_aux a n p (Suc k) ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (b *\<^sub>p p')))))))"
+ else
+ (let b = head s; m = degree s in
+ (if m < n then (k,s)
+ else
+ (let p'= funpow (m - n) shift1 p in
+ (if a = b then polydivide_aux a n p k (s -\<^sub>p p')
+ else polydivide_aux a n p (Suc k) ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (b *\<^sub>p p')))))))"
definition polydivide :: "poly \<Rightarrow> poly \<Rightarrow> (nat \<times> poly)"
where "polydivide s p \<equiv> polydivide_aux (head p) (degree p) p 0 s"
@@ -234,9 +236,9 @@
Ipoly_syntax :: "poly \<Rightarrow> 'a list \<Rightarrow>'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero, power}" ("\<lparr>_\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>_\<^esup>")
where "\<lparr>p\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> \<equiv> Ipoly bs p"
-lemma Ipoly_CInt: "Ipoly bs (C (i,1)) = of_int i"
+lemma Ipoly_CInt: "Ipoly bs (C (i,1)) = of_int i"
by (simp add: INum_def)
-lemma Ipoly_CRat: "Ipoly bs (C (i, j)) = of_int i / of_int j"
+lemma Ipoly_CRat: "Ipoly bs (C (i, j)) = of_int i / of_int j"
by (simp add: INum_def)
lemmas RIpoly_eqs = Ipoly.simps(2-7) Ipoly_CInt Ipoly_CRat
@@ -258,49 +260,52 @@
text{* polyadd preserves normal forms *}
-lemma polyadd_normh: "\<lbrakk>isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1\<rbrakk>
+lemma polyadd_normh: "\<lbrakk>isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> isnpolyh (polyadd p q) (min n0 n1)"
-proof(induct p q arbitrary: n0 n1 rule: polyadd.induct)
+proof (induct p q arbitrary: n0 n1 rule: polyadd.induct)
case (2 ab c' n' p' n0 n1)
- from 2 have th1: "isnpolyh (C ab) (Suc n')" by simp
+ from 2 have th1: "isnpolyh (C ab) (Suc n')" by simp
from 2(3) have th2: "isnpolyh c' (Suc n')" and nplen1: "n' \<ge> n1" by simp_all
with isnpolyh_mono have cp: "isnpolyh c' (Suc n')" by simp
with 2(1)[OF th1 th2] have th3:"isnpolyh (C ab +\<^sub>p c') (Suc n')" by simp
- from nplen1 have n01len1: "min n0 n1 \<le> n'" by simp
+ from nplen1 have n01len1: "min n0 n1 \<le> n'" by simp
thus ?case using 2 th3 by simp
next
case (3 c' n' p' ab n1 n0)
- from 3 have th1: "isnpolyh (C ab) (Suc n')" by simp
+ from 3 have th1: "isnpolyh (C ab) (Suc n')" by simp
from 3(2) have th2: "isnpolyh c' (Suc n')" and nplen1: "n' \<ge> n1" by simp_all
with isnpolyh_mono have cp: "isnpolyh c' (Suc n')" by simp
with 3(1)[OF th2 th1] have th3:"isnpolyh (c' +\<^sub>p C ab) (Suc n')" by simp
- from nplen1 have n01len1: "min n0 n1 \<le> n'" by simp
+ from nplen1 have n01len1: "min n0 n1 \<le> n'" by simp
thus ?case using 3 th3 by simp
next
case (4 c n p c' n' p' n0 n1)
hence nc: "isnpolyh c (Suc n)" and np: "isnpolyh p n" by simp_all
- from 4 have nc': "isnpolyh c' (Suc n')" and np': "isnpolyh p' n'" by simp_all
+ from 4 have nc': "isnpolyh c' (Suc n')" and np': "isnpolyh p' n'" by simp_all
from 4 have ngen0: "n \<ge> n0" by simp
- from 4 have n'gen1: "n' \<ge> n1" by simp
+ from 4 have n'gen1: "n' \<ge> n1" by simp
have "n < n' \<or> n' < n \<or> n = n'" by auto
- moreover {assume eq: "n = n'"
- with "4.hyps"(3)[OF nc nc']
+ moreover {
+ assume eq: "n = n'"
+ with "4.hyps"(3)[OF nc nc']
have ncc':"isnpolyh (c +\<^sub>p c') (Suc n)" by auto
hence ncc'n01: "isnpolyh (c +\<^sub>p c') (min n0 n1)"
using isnpolyh_mono[where n'="min n0 n1" and n="Suc n"] ngen0 n'gen1 by auto
from eq "4.hyps"(4)[OF np np'] have npp': "isnpolyh (p +\<^sub>p p') n" by simp
have minle: "min n0 n1 \<le> n'" using ngen0 n'gen1 eq by simp
- from minle npp' ncc'n01 4 eq ngen0 n'gen1 ncc' have ?case by (simp add: Let_def)}
- moreover {assume lt: "n < n'"
+ from minle npp' ncc'n01 4 eq ngen0 n'gen1 ncc' have ?case by (simp add: Let_def) }
+ moreover {
+ assume lt: "n < n'"
have "min n0 n1 \<le> n0" by simp
- with 4 lt have th1:"min n0 n1 \<le> n" by auto
+ with 4 lt have th1:"min n0 n1 \<le> n" by auto
from 4 have th21: "isnpolyh c (Suc n)" by simp
from 4 have th22: "isnpolyh (CN c' n' p') n'" by simp
from lt have th23: "min (Suc n) n' = Suc n" by arith
from "4.hyps"(1)[OF th21 th22]
have "isnpolyh (polyadd c (CN c' n' p')) (Suc n)" using th23 by simp
- with 4 lt th1 have ?case by simp }
- moreover {assume gt: "n' < n" hence gt': "n' < n \<and> \<not> n < n'" by simp
+ with 4 lt th1 have ?case by simp }
+ moreover {
+ assume gt: "n' < n" hence gt': "n' < n \<and> \<not> n < n'" by simp
have "min n0 n1 \<le> n1" by simp
with 4 gt have th1:"min n0 n1 \<le> n'" by auto
from 4 have th21: "isnpolyh c' (Suc n')" by simp_all
@@ -308,8 +313,8 @@
from gt have th23: "min n (Suc n') = Suc n'" by arith
from "4.hyps"(2)[OF th22 th21]
have "isnpolyh (polyadd (CN c n p) c') (Suc n')" using th23 by simp
- with 4 gt th1 have ?case by simp}
- ultimately show ?case by blast
+ with 4 gt th1 have ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
qed auto
lemma polyadd[simp]: "Ipoly bs (polyadd p q) = Ipoly bs p + Ipoly bs q"
@@ -321,8 +326,8 @@
text{* The degree of addition and other general lemmas needed for the normal form of polymul *}
-lemma polyadd_different_degreen:
- "\<lbrakk>isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1; degreen p m \<noteq> degreen q m ; m \<le> min n0 n1\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
+lemma polyadd_different_degreen:
+ "\<lbrakk>isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1; degreen p m \<noteq> degreen q m ; m \<le> min n0 n1\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
degreen (polyadd p q) m = max (degreen p m) (degreen q m)"
proof (induct p q arbitrary: m n0 n1 rule: polyadd.induct)
case (4 c n p c' n' p' m n0 n1)
@@ -362,11 +367,13 @@
shows "degreen (p +\<^sub>p q) m \<le> max (degreen p m) (degreen q m)"
using np nq m
proof (induct p q arbitrary: n0 n1 m rule: polyadd.induct)
- case (2 c c' n' p' n0 n1) thus ?case by (cases n') simp_all
+ case (2 c c' n' p' n0 n1)
+ thus ?case by (cases n') simp_all
next
- case (3 c n p c' n0 n1) thus ?case by (cases n) auto
+ case (3 c n p c' n0 n1)
+ thus ?case by (cases n) auto
next
- case (4 c n p c' n' p' n0 n1 m)
+ case (4 c n p c' n' p' n0 n1 m)
have "n' = n \<or> n < n' \<or> n' < n" by arith
thus ?case
proof (elim disjE)
@@ -376,21 +383,21 @@
qed simp_all
qed auto
-lemma polyadd_eq_const_degreen: "\<lbrakk> isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1 ; polyadd p q = C c\<rbrakk>
+lemma polyadd_eq_const_degreen: "\<lbrakk> isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1 ; polyadd p q = C c\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> degreen p m = degreen q m"
proof (induct p q arbitrary: m n0 n1 c rule: polyadd.induct)
- case (4 c n p c' n' p' m n0 n1 x)
- {assume nn': "n' < n" hence ?case using 4 by simp}
- moreover
- {assume nn':"\<not> n' < n" hence "n < n' \<or> n = n'" by arith
- moreover {assume "n < n'" with 4 have ?case by simp }
- moreover {assume eq: "n = n'" hence ?case using 4
+ case (4 c n p c' n' p' m n0 n1 x)
+ { assume nn': "n' < n" hence ?case using 4 by simp }
+ moreover
+ { assume nn':"\<not> n' < n" hence "n < n' \<or> n = n'" by arith
+ moreover { assume "n < n'" with 4 have ?case by simp }
+ moreover { assume eq: "n = n'" hence ?case using 4
apply (cases "p +\<^sub>p p' = 0\<^sub>p")
apply (auto simp add: Let_def)
apply blast
done
- }
- ultimately have ?case by blast}
+ }
+ ultimately have ?case by blast }
ultimately show ?case by blast
qed simp_all
@@ -399,37 +406,37 @@
and np: "isnpolyh p n0"
and nq: "isnpolyh q n1"
and m: "m \<le> min n0 n1"
- shows "isnpolyh (p *\<^sub>p q) (min n0 n1)"
- and "(p *\<^sub>p q = 0\<^sub>p) = (p = 0\<^sub>p \<or> q = 0\<^sub>p)"
+ shows "isnpolyh (p *\<^sub>p q) (min n0 n1)"
+ and "(p *\<^sub>p q = 0\<^sub>p) = (p = 0\<^sub>p \<or> q = 0\<^sub>p)"
and "degreen (p *\<^sub>p q) m = (if (p = 0\<^sub>p \<or> q = 0\<^sub>p) then 0 else degreen p m + degreen q m)"
using np nq m
proof (induct p q arbitrary: n0 n1 m rule: polymul.induct)
- case (2 c c' n' p')
- { case (1 n0 n1)
+ case (2 c c' n' p')
+ { case (1 n0 n1)
with "2.hyps"(4-6)[of n' n' n']
and "2.hyps"(1-3)[of "Suc n'" "Suc n'" n']
show ?case by (auto simp add: min_def)
next
- case (2 n0 n1) thus ?case by auto
+ case (2 n0 n1) thus ?case by auto
next
- case (3 n0 n1) thus ?case using "2.hyps" by auto }
+ case (3 n0 n1) thus ?case using "2.hyps" by auto }
next
case (3 c n p c')
- { case (1 n0 n1)
+ { case (1 n0 n1)
with "3.hyps"(4-6)[of n n n]
"3.hyps"(1-3)[of "Suc n" "Suc n" n]
show ?case by (auto simp add: min_def)
next
case (2 n0 n1) thus ?case by auto
next
- case (3 n0 n1) thus ?case using "3.hyps" by auto }
+ case (3 n0 n1) thus ?case using "3.hyps" by auto }
next
case (4 c n p c' n' p')
let ?cnp = "CN c n p" let ?cnp' = "CN c' n' p'"
{
case (1 n0 n1)
hence cnp: "isnpolyh ?cnp n" and cnp': "isnpolyh ?cnp' n'"
- and np: "isnpolyh p n" and nc: "isnpolyh c (Suc n)"
+ and np: "isnpolyh p n" and nc: "isnpolyh c (Suc n)"
and np': "isnpolyh p' n'" and nc': "isnpolyh c' (Suc n')"
and nn0: "n \<ge> n0" and nn1:"n' \<ge> n1"
by simp_all
@@ -462,23 +469,24 @@
let ?d2 = "degreen ?cnp' m"
let ?eq = "?d = (if ?cnp = 0\<^sub>p \<or> ?cnp' = 0\<^sub>p then 0 else ?d1 + ?d2)"
have "n'<n \<or> n < n' \<or> n' = n" by auto
- moreover
+ moreover
{assume "n' < n \<or> n < n'"
- with "4.hyps"(3,6,18) np np' m
+ with "4.hyps"(3,6,18) np np' m
have ?eq by auto }
moreover
- {assume nn': "n' = n" hence nn:"\<not> n' < n \<and> \<not> n < n'" by arith
+ { assume nn': "n' = n"
+ hence nn: "\<not> n' < n \<and> \<not> n < n'" by arith
from "4.hyps"(16,18)[of n n' n]
"4.hyps"(13,14)[of n "Suc n'" n]
np np' nn'
have norm: "isnpolyh ?cnp n" "isnpolyh c' (Suc n)" "isnpolyh (?cnp *\<^sub>p c') n"
"isnpolyh p' n" "isnpolyh (?cnp *\<^sub>p p') n" "isnpolyh (CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p')) n"
- "(?cnp *\<^sub>p c' = 0\<^sub>p) = (c' = 0\<^sub>p)"
+ "(?cnp *\<^sub>p c' = 0\<^sub>p) = (c' = 0\<^sub>p)"
"?cnp *\<^sub>p p' \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p" by (auto simp add: min_def)
- {assume mn: "m = n"
+ { assume mn: "m = n"
from "4.hyps"(17,18)[OF norm(1,4), of n]
"4.hyps"(13,15)[OF norm(1,2), of n] norm nn' mn
- have degs: "degreen (?cnp *\<^sub>p c') n =
+ have degs: "degreen (?cnp *\<^sub>p c') n =
(if c'=0\<^sub>p then 0 else ?d1 + degreen c' n)"
"degreen (?cnp *\<^sub>p p') n = ?d1 + degreen p' n" by (simp_all add: min_def)
from degs norm
@@ -487,31 +495,31 @@
by simp
have nmin: "n \<le> min n n" by (simp add: min_def)
from polyadd_different_degreen[OF norm(3,6) neq nmin] th1
- have deg: "degreen (CN c n p *\<^sub>p c' +\<^sub>p CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p')) n = degreen (CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p')) n" by simp
+ have deg: "degreen (CN c n p *\<^sub>p c' +\<^sub>p CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p')) n = degreen (CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p')) n" by simp
from "4.hyps"(16-18)[OF norm(1,4), of n]
"4.hyps"(13-15)[OF norm(1,2), of n]
mn norm m nn' deg
- have ?eq by simp}
+ have ?eq by simp }
moreover
- {assume mn: "m \<noteq> n" hence mn': "m < n" using m np by auto
- from nn' m np have max1: "m \<le> max n n" by simp
- hence min1: "m \<le> min n n" by simp
+ { assume mn: "m \<noteq> n" hence mn': "m < n" using m np by auto
+ from nn' m np have max1: "m \<le> max n n" by simp
+ hence min1: "m \<le> min n n" by simp
hence min2: "m \<le> min n (Suc n)" by simp
from "4.hyps"(16-18)[OF norm(1,4) min1]
"4.hyps"(13-15)[OF norm(1,2) min2]
degreen_polyadd[OF norm(3,6) max1]
- have "degreen (?cnp *\<^sub>p c' +\<^sub>p CN 0\<^sub>p n (?cnp *\<^sub>p p')) m
+ have "degreen (?cnp *\<^sub>p c' +\<^sub>p CN 0\<^sub>p n (?cnp *\<^sub>p p')) m
\<le> max (degreen (?cnp *\<^sub>p c') m) (degreen (CN 0\<^sub>p n (?cnp *\<^sub>p p')) m)"
using mn nn' np np' by simp
with "4.hyps"(16-18)[OF norm(1,4) min1]
"4.hyps"(13-15)[OF norm(1,2) min2]
degreen_0[OF norm(3) mn']
- have ?eq using nn' mn np np' by clarsimp}
- ultimately have ?eq by blast}
- ultimately show ?eq by blast}
+ have ?eq using nn' mn np np' by clarsimp }
+ ultimately have ?eq by blast }
+ ultimately show ?eq by blast }
{ case (2 n0 n1)
- hence np: "isnpolyh ?cnp n0" and np': "isnpolyh ?cnp' n1"
+ hence np: "isnpolyh ?cnp n0" and np': "isnpolyh ?cnp' n1"
and m: "m \<le> min n0 n1" by simp_all
hence mn: "m \<le> n" by simp
let ?c0p = "CN 0\<^sub>p n (?cnp *\<^sub>p p')"
@@ -522,32 +530,32 @@
np np' C(2) mn
have norm: "isnpolyh ?cnp n" "isnpolyh c' (Suc n)" "isnpolyh (?cnp *\<^sub>p c') n"
"isnpolyh p' n" "isnpolyh (?cnp *\<^sub>p p') n" "isnpolyh (CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p')) n"
- "(?cnp *\<^sub>p c' = 0\<^sub>p) = (c' = 0\<^sub>p)"
- "?cnp *\<^sub>p p' \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
+ "(?cnp *\<^sub>p c' = 0\<^sub>p) = (c' = 0\<^sub>p)"
+ "?cnp *\<^sub>p p' \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
"degreen (?cnp *\<^sub>p c') n = (if c'=0\<^sub>p then 0 else degreen ?cnp n + degreen c' n)"
"degreen (?cnp *\<^sub>p p') n = degreen ?cnp n + degreen p' n"
by (simp_all add: min_def)
-
+
from norm have cn: "isnpolyh (CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p')) n" by simp
- have degneq: "degreen (?cnp *\<^sub>p c') n < degreen (CN 0\<^sub>p n (?cnp *\<^sub>p p')) n"
+ have degneq: "degreen (?cnp *\<^sub>p c') n < degreen (CN 0\<^sub>p n (?cnp *\<^sub>p p')) n"
using norm by simp
from polyadd_eq_const_degreen[OF norm(3) cn C(1), where m="n"] degneq
have "False" by simp }
- thus ?case using "4.hyps" by clarsimp}
+ thus ?case using "4.hyps" by clarsimp }
qed auto
lemma polymul[simp]: "Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p q) = (Ipoly bs p) * (Ipoly bs q)"
by (induct p q rule: polymul.induct) (auto simp add: field_simps)
-lemma polymul_normh:
+lemma polymul_normh:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
shows "\<lbrakk>isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> isnpolyh (p *\<^sub>p q) (min n0 n1)"
- using polymul_properties(1) by blast
+ using polymul_properties(1) by blast
-lemma polymul_eq0_iff:
+lemma polymul_eq0_iff:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
shows "\<lbrakk> isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (p *\<^sub>p q = 0\<^sub>p) = (p = 0\<^sub>p \<or> q = 0\<^sub>p) "
- using polymul_properties(2) by blast
+ using polymul_properties(2) by blast
lemma polymul_degreen: (* FIXME duplicate? *)
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
@@ -555,7 +563,7 @@
degreen (p *\<^sub>p q) m = (if (p = 0\<^sub>p \<or> q = 0\<^sub>p) then 0 else degreen p m + degreen q m)"
using polymul_properties(3) by blast
-lemma polymul_norm:
+lemma polymul_norm:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
shows "\<lbrakk> isnpoly p; isnpoly q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> isnpoly (polymul p q)"
using polymul_normh[of "p" "0" "q" "0"] isnpoly_def by simp
@@ -567,14 +575,14 @@
by (induct p arbitrary: n0) auto
lemma monic_eqI:
- assumes np: "isnpolyh p n0"
+ assumes np: "isnpolyh p n0"
shows "INum (headconst p) * Ipoly bs (fst (monic p)) =
(Ipoly bs p ::'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero, power})"
unfolding monic_def Let_def
proof (cases "headconst p = 0\<^sub>N", simp_all add: headconst_zero[OF np])
let ?h = "headconst p"
assume pz: "p \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
- {assume hz: "INum ?h = (0::'a)"
+ { assume hz: "INum ?h = (0::'a)"
from headconst_isnormNum[OF np] have norm: "isnormNum ?h" "isnormNum 0\<^sub>N" by simp_all
from isnormNum_unique[where ?'a = 'a, OF norm] hz have "?h = 0\<^sub>N" by simp
with headconst_zero[OF np] have "p =0\<^sub>p" by blast with pz have "False" by blast}
@@ -602,18 +610,19 @@
lemma polysub[simp]: "Ipoly bs (polysub p q) = (Ipoly bs p) - (Ipoly bs q)"
by (simp add: polysub_def)
-lemma polysub_normh: "\<And> n0 n1. \<lbrakk> isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> isnpolyh (polysub p q) (min n0 n1)"
+lemma polysub_normh:
+ "\<And>n0 n1. \<lbrakk> isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> isnpolyh (polysub p q) (min n0 n1)"
by (simp add: polysub_def polyneg_normh polyadd_normh)
lemma polysub_norm: "\<lbrakk> isnpoly p; isnpoly q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> isnpoly (polysub p q)"
- using polyadd_norm polyneg_norm by (simp add: polysub_def)
+ using polyadd_norm polyneg_norm by (simp add: polysub_def)
lemma polysub_same_0[simp]:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
shows "isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> polysub p p = 0\<^sub>p"
unfolding polysub_def split_def fst_conv snd_conv
by (induct p arbitrary: n0) (auto simp add: Let_def Nsub0[simplified Nsub_def])
-lemma polysub_0:
+lemma polysub_0:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
shows "\<lbrakk> isnpolyh p n0 ; isnpolyh q n1\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (p -\<^sub>p q = 0\<^sub>p) = (p = q)"
unfolding polysub_def split_def fst_conv snd_conv
@@ -631,8 +640,8 @@
let ?q = "polypow ((Suc n) div 2) p"
let ?d = "polymul ?q ?q"
have "odd (Suc n) \<or> even (Suc n)" by simp
- moreover
- {assume odd: "odd (Suc n)"
+ moreover
+ { assume odd: "odd (Suc n)"
have th: "(Suc (Suc (Suc (0\<Colon>nat)) * (Suc n div Suc (Suc (0\<Colon>nat))))) = Suc n div 2 + Suc n div 2 + 1"
by arith
from odd have "Ipoly bs (p ^\<^sub>p Suc n) = Ipoly bs (polymul p ?d)" by (simp add: Let_def)
@@ -642,10 +651,10 @@
by (simp only: power_add power_one_right) simp
also have "\<dots> = (Ipoly bs p) ^ (Suc (Suc (Suc (0\<Colon>nat)) * (Suc n div Suc (Suc (0\<Colon>nat)))))"
by (simp only: th)
- finally have ?case
+ finally have ?case
using odd_nat_div_two_times_two_plus_one[OF odd, symmetric] by simp }
- moreover
- {assume even: "even (Suc n)"
+ moreover
+ { assume even: "even (Suc n)"
have th: "(Suc (Suc (0\<Colon>nat))) * (Suc n div Suc (Suc (0\<Colon>nat))) = Suc n div 2 + Suc n div 2"
by arith
from even have "Ipoly bs (p ^\<^sub>p Suc n) = Ipoly bs ?d" by (simp add: Let_def)
@@ -655,7 +664,7 @@
ultimately show ?case by blast
qed
-lemma polypow_normh:
+lemma polypow_normh:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
shows "isnpolyh p n \<Longrightarrow> isnpolyh (polypow k p) n"
proof (induct k arbitrary: n rule: polypow.induct)
@@ -666,9 +675,9 @@
from polymul_normh[OF th1 th1] have dn: "isnpolyh ?d n" by simp
from polymul_normh[OF th2 dn] have on: "isnpolyh (polymul p ?d) n" by simp
from dn on show ?case by (simp add: Let_def)
-qed auto
+qed auto
-lemma polypow_norm:
+lemma polypow_norm:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
shows "isnpoly p \<Longrightarrow> isnpoly (polypow k p)"
by (simp add: polypow_normh isnpoly_def)
@@ -679,7 +688,7 @@
"Ipoly bs (polynate p) = (Ipoly bs p :: 'a ::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
by (induct p rule:polynate.induct) auto
-lemma polynate_norm[simp]:
+lemma polynate_norm[simp]:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
shows "isnpoly (polynate p)"
by (induct p rule: polynate.induct)
@@ -692,7 +701,7 @@
lemma shift1: "Ipoly bs (shift1 p) = Ipoly bs (Mul (Bound 0) p)"
by (simp add: shift1_def)
-lemma shift1_isnpoly:
+lemma shift1_isnpoly:
assumes pn: "isnpoly p"
and pnz: "p \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
shows "isnpoly (shift1 p) "
@@ -700,11 +709,11 @@
lemma shift1_nz[simp]:"shift1 p \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
by (simp add: shift1_def)
-lemma funpow_shift1_isnpoly:
+lemma funpow_shift1_isnpoly:
"\<lbrakk> isnpoly p ; p \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> isnpoly (funpow n shift1 p)"
by (induct n arbitrary: p) (auto simp add: shift1_isnpoly funpow_swap1)
-lemma funpow_isnpolyh:
+lemma funpow_isnpolyh:
assumes f: "\<And> p. isnpolyh p n \<Longrightarrow> isnpolyh (f p) n"
and np: "isnpolyh p n"
shows "isnpolyh (funpow k f p) n"
@@ -718,7 +727,7 @@
lemma shift1_isnpolyh: "isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> p\<noteq> 0\<^sub>p \<Longrightarrow> isnpolyh (shift1 p) 0"
using isnpolyh_mono[where n="n0" and n'="0" and p="p"] by (simp add: shift1_def)
-lemma funpow_shift1_1:
+lemma funpow_shift1_1:
"(Ipoly bs (funpow n shift1 p) :: 'a :: {field_char_0, field_inverse_zero}) =
Ipoly bs (funpow n shift1 (1)\<^sub>p *\<^sub>p p)"
by (simp add: funpow_shift1)
@@ -733,8 +742,8 @@
using np
proof (induct p arbitrary: n rule: behead.induct)
case (1 c p n) hence pn: "isnpolyh p n" by simp
- from 1(1)[OF pn]
- have th:"Ipoly bs (Add (Mul (head p) (Pw (Bound 0) (degree p))) (behead p)) = Ipoly bs p" .
+ from 1(1)[OF pn]
+ have th:"Ipoly bs (Add (Mul (head p) (Pw (Bound 0) (degree p))) (behead p)) = Ipoly bs p" .
then show ?case using "1.hyps"
apply (simp add: Let_def,cases "behead p = 0\<^sub>p")
apply (simp_all add: th[symmetric] field_simps)
@@ -778,7 +787,7 @@
assumes nb: "polybound0 a"
shows "Ipoly (b#bs) a = Ipoly (b'#bs) a"
using nb
- by (induct a rule: poly.induct) auto
+ by (induct a rule: poly.induct) auto
lemma polysubst0_I: "Ipoly (b#bs) (polysubst0 a t) = Ipoly ((Ipoly (b#bs) a)#bs) t"
by (induct t) simp_all
@@ -816,15 +825,15 @@
lemma wf_bs_coefficients: "wf_bs bs p \<Longrightarrow> \<forall> c \<in> set (coefficients p). wf_bs bs c"
proof (induct p rule: coefficients.induct)
- case (1 c p)
- show ?case
+ case (1 c p)
+ show ?case
proof
fix x assume xc: "x \<in> set (coefficients (CN c 0 p))"
hence "x = c \<or> x \<in> set (coefficients p)" by simp
- moreover
+ moreover
{assume "x = c" hence "wf_bs bs x" using "1.prems" unfolding wf_bs_def by simp}
- moreover
- {assume H: "x \<in> set (coefficients p)"
+ moreover
+ {assume H: "x \<in> set (coefficients p)"
from "1.prems" have "wf_bs bs p" unfolding wf_bs_def by simp
with "1.hyps" H have "wf_bs bs x" by blast }
ultimately show "wf_bs bs x" by blast
@@ -838,7 +847,7 @@
unfolding wf_bs_def by (induct p) (auto simp add: nth_append)
lemma take_maxindex_wf:
- assumes wf: "wf_bs bs p"
+ assumes wf: "wf_bs bs p"
shows "Ipoly (take (maxindex p) bs) p = Ipoly bs p"
proof-
let ?ip = "maxindex p"
@@ -885,14 +894,14 @@
done
lemma wf_bs_polyadd: "wf_bs bs p \<and> wf_bs bs q \<longrightarrow> wf_bs bs (p +\<^sub>p q)"
- unfolding wf_bs_def
+ unfolding wf_bs_def
apply (induct p q rule: polyadd.induct)
apply (auto simp add: Let_def)
done
lemma wf_bs_polyul: "wf_bs bs p \<Longrightarrow> wf_bs bs q \<Longrightarrow> wf_bs bs (p *\<^sub>p q)"
- unfolding wf_bs_def
- apply (induct p q arbitrary: bs rule: polymul.induct)
+ unfolding wf_bs_def
+ apply (induct p q arbitrary: bs rule: polymul.induct)
apply (simp_all add: wf_bs_polyadd)
apply clarsimp
apply (rule wf_bs_polyadd[unfolded wf_bs_def, rule_format])
@@ -918,12 +927,12 @@
have cp: "isnpolyh (CN c 0 p) n0" by fact
hence norm: "isnpolyh c 0" "isnpolyh p 0" "p \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p" "n0 = 0"
by (auto simp add: isnpolyh_mono[where n'=0])
- from "1.hyps"[OF norm(2)] norm(1) norm(4) show ?case by simp
+ from "1.hyps"[OF norm(2)] norm(1) norm(4) show ?case by simp
qed auto
lemma coefficients_isconst:
"isnpolyh p n \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>q\<in>set (coefficients p). isconstant q"
- by (induct p arbitrary: n rule: coefficients.induct)
+ by (induct p arbitrary: n rule: coefficients.induct)
(auto simp add: isnpolyh_Suc_const)
lemma polypoly_polypoly':
@@ -940,17 +949,17 @@
hence "\<forall>q \<in> ?cf. Ipoly (x#bs) q = Ipoly bs (decrpoly q)"
using polybound0_I[where b=x and bs=bs and b'=y] decrpoly[where x=x and bs=bs]
by auto
-
- thus ?thesis unfolding polypoly_def polypoly'_def by simp
+
+ thus ?thesis unfolding polypoly_def polypoly'_def by simp
qed
lemma polypoly_poly:
assumes np: "isnpolyh p n0"
shows "Ipoly (x#bs) p = poly (polypoly (x#bs) p) x"
- using np
+ using np
by (induct p arbitrary: n0 bs rule: coefficients.induct) (auto simp add: polypoly_def)
-lemma polypoly'_poly:
+lemma polypoly'_poly:
assumes np: "isnpolyh p n0"
shows "\<lparr>p\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>x # bs\<^esup> = poly (polypoly' bs p) x"
using polypoly_poly[OF np, simplified polypoly_polypoly'[OF np]] .
@@ -959,14 +968,14 @@
lemma polypoly_poly_polybound0:
assumes np: "isnpolyh p n0" and nb: "polybound0 p"
shows "polypoly bs p = [Ipoly bs p]"
- using np nb unfolding polypoly_def
+ using np nb unfolding polypoly_def
apply (cases p)
apply auto
apply (case_tac nat)
apply auto
done
-lemma head_isnpolyh: "isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> isnpolyh (head p) n0"
+lemma head_isnpolyh: "isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> isnpolyh (head p) n0"
by (induct p rule: head.induct) auto
lemma headn_nz[simp]: "isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> (headn p m = 0\<^sub>p) = (p = 0\<^sub>p)"
@@ -978,7 +987,7 @@
lemma head_nz[simp]: "isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> (head p = 0\<^sub>p) = (p = 0\<^sub>p)"
by (simp add: head_eq_headn0)
-lemma isnpolyh_zero_iff:
+lemma isnpolyh_zero_iff:
assumes nq: "isnpolyh p n0"
and eq :"\<forall>bs. wf_bs bs p \<longrightarrow> \<lparr>p\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> = (0::'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero, power})"
shows "p = 0\<^sub>p"
@@ -994,10 +1003,10 @@
let ?h = "head p"
let ?hd = "decrpoly ?h"
let ?ihd = "maxindex ?hd"
- from head_isnpolyh[OF np] head_polybound0[OF np] have h:"isnpolyh ?h n0" "polybound0 ?h"
+ from head_isnpolyh[OF np] head_polybound0[OF np] have h:"isnpolyh ?h n0" "polybound0 ?h"
by simp_all
hence nhd: "isnpolyh ?hd (n0 - 1)" using decrpoly_normh by blast
-
+
from maxindex_coefficients[of p] coefficients_head[of p, symmetric]
have mihn: "maxindex ?h \<le> maxindex p" by auto
with decr_maxindex[OF h(2)] nz have ihd_lt_n: "?ihd < maxindex p" by auto
@@ -1023,21 +1032,21 @@
with th0 wf_bs_I[of ?ts ?hd xs] have "Ipoly ?ts ?hd = 0" by simp
with wf'' wf_bs_I[of ?ts ?hd ?rs] bs_ts_eq have "\<lparr>?hd\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> = 0" by simp }
then have hdz: "\<forall>bs. wf_bs bs ?hd \<longrightarrow> \<lparr>?hd\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> = (0::'a)" by blast
-
+
from less(1)[OF ihd_lt_n nhd] hdz have "?hd = 0\<^sub>p" by blast
hence "?h = 0\<^sub>p" by simp
with head_nz[OF np] have "p = 0\<^sub>p" by simp}
ultimately show "p = 0\<^sub>p" by blast
qed
-lemma isnpolyh_unique:
+lemma isnpolyh_unique:
assumes np:"isnpolyh p n0"
and nq: "isnpolyh q n1"
shows "(\<forall>bs. \<lparr>p\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> = (\<lparr>q\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> :: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero, power})) \<longleftrightarrow> p = q"
proof(auto)
assume H: "\<forall>bs. (\<lparr>p\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> ::'a)= \<lparr>q\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup>"
hence "\<forall>bs.\<lparr>p -\<^sub>p q\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup>= (0::'a)" by simp
- hence "\<forall>bs. wf_bs bs (p -\<^sub>p q) \<longrightarrow> \<lparr>p -\<^sub>p q\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> = (0::'a)"
+ hence "\<forall>bs. wf_bs bs (p -\<^sub>p q) \<longrightarrow> \<lparr>p -\<^sub>p q\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> = (0::'a)"
using wf_bs_polysub[where p=p and q=q] by auto
with isnpolyh_zero_iff[OF polysub_normh[OF np nq]] polysub_0[OF np nq]
show "p = q" by blast
@@ -1056,28 +1065,28 @@
lemma zero_normh: "isnpolyh 0\<^sub>p n" by simp
lemma one_normh: "isnpolyh (1)\<^sub>p n" by simp
-lemma polyadd_0[simp]:
+lemma polyadd_0[simp]:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
and np: "isnpolyh p n0"
shows "p +\<^sub>p 0\<^sub>p = p" and "0\<^sub>p +\<^sub>p p = p"
- using isnpolyh_unique[OF polyadd_normh[OF np zero_normh] np]
+ using isnpolyh_unique[OF polyadd_normh[OF np zero_normh] np]
isnpolyh_unique[OF polyadd_normh[OF zero_normh np] np] by simp_all
-lemma polymul_1[simp]:
+lemma polymul_1[simp]:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
and np: "isnpolyh p n0"
shows "p *\<^sub>p (1)\<^sub>p = p" and "(1)\<^sub>p *\<^sub>p p = p"
- using isnpolyh_unique[OF polymul_normh[OF np one_normh] np]
+ using isnpolyh_unique[OF polymul_normh[OF np one_normh] np]
isnpolyh_unique[OF polymul_normh[OF one_normh np] np] by simp_all
-lemma polymul_0[simp]:
+lemma polymul_0[simp]:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
and np: "isnpolyh p n0"
shows "p *\<^sub>p 0\<^sub>p = 0\<^sub>p" and "0\<^sub>p *\<^sub>p p = 0\<^sub>p"
- using isnpolyh_unique[OF polymul_normh[OF np zero_normh] zero_normh]
+ using isnpolyh_unique[OF polymul_normh[OF np zero_normh] zero_normh]
isnpolyh_unique[OF polymul_normh[OF zero_normh np] zero_normh] by simp_all
-lemma polymul_commute:
+lemma polymul_commute:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
and np:"isnpolyh p n0"
and nq: "isnpolyh q n1"
@@ -1086,15 +1095,15 @@
by simp
declare polyneg_polyneg [simp]
-
-lemma isnpolyh_polynate_id [simp]:
+
+lemma isnpolyh_polynate_id [simp]:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
and np:"isnpolyh p n0"
shows "polynate p = p"
using isnpolyh_unique[where ?'a= "'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero}", OF polynate_norm[of p, unfolded isnpoly_def] np] polynate[where ?'a = "'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero}"]
by simp
-lemma polynate_idempotent[simp]:
+lemma polynate_idempotent[simp]:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
shows "polynate (polynate p) = polynate p"
using isnpolyh_polynate_id[OF polynate_norm[of p, unfolded isnpoly_def]] .
@@ -1137,34 +1146,34 @@
from degree_polyadd[OF np nq'] show ?thesis by (simp add: polysub_def degree_polyneg[OF nq])
qed
-lemma degree_polysub_samehead:
+lemma degree_polysub_samehead:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
- and np: "isnpolyh p n0" and nq: "isnpolyh q n1" and h: "head p = head q"
+ and np: "isnpolyh p n0" and nq: "isnpolyh q n1" and h: "head p = head q"
and d: "degree p = degree q"
shows "degree (p -\<^sub>p q) < degree p \<or> (p -\<^sub>p q = 0\<^sub>p)"
unfolding polysub_def split_def fst_conv snd_conv
using np nq h d
proof (induct p q rule: polyadd.induct)
case (1 c c')
- thus ?case by (simp add: Nsub_def Nsub0[simplified Nsub_def])
+ thus ?case by (simp add: Nsub_def Nsub0[simplified Nsub_def])
next
- case (2 c c' n' p')
+ case (2 c c' n' p')
from 2 have "degree (C c) = degree (CN c' n' p')" by simp
hence nz:"n' > 0" by (cases n') auto
hence "head (CN c' n' p') = CN c' n' p'" by (cases n') auto
with 2 show ?case by simp
next
- case (3 c n p c')
+ case (3 c n p c')
hence "degree (C c') = degree (CN c n p)" by simp
hence nz:"n > 0" by (cases n) auto
hence "head (CN c n p) = CN c n p" by (cases n) auto
with 3 show ?case by simp
next
case (4 c n p c' n' p')
- hence H: "isnpolyh (CN c n p) n0" "isnpolyh (CN c' n' p') n1"
+ hence H: "isnpolyh (CN c n p) n0" "isnpolyh (CN c' n' p') n1"
"head (CN c n p) = head (CN c' n' p')" "degree (CN c n p) = degree (CN c' n' p')" by simp+
- hence degc: "degree c = 0" and degc': "degree c' = 0" by simp_all
- hence degnc: "degree (~\<^sub>p c) = 0" and degnc': "degree (~\<^sub>p c') = 0"
+ hence degc: "degree c = 0" and degc': "degree c' = 0" by simp_all
+ hence degnc: "degree (~\<^sub>p c) = 0" and degnc': "degree (~\<^sub>p c') = 0"
using H(1-2) degree_polyneg by auto
from H have cnh: "isnpolyh c (Suc n)" and c'nh: "isnpolyh c' (Suc n')" by simp+
from degree_polysub[OF cnh c'nh, simplified polysub_def] degc degc' have degcmc': "degree (c +\<^sub>p ~\<^sub>pc') = 0" by simp
@@ -1178,10 +1187,10 @@
with nn' H(3) have cc':"c = c'" and pp': "p = p'" by (cases n, auto)+
hence ?case
using polysub_same_0[OF p'nh, simplified polysub_def split_def fst_conv snd_conv] polysub_same_0[OF c'nh, simplified polysub_def]
- using nn' 4 by (simp add: Let_def)}
+ using nn' 4 by (simp add: Let_def) }
ultimately have ?case by blast}
moreover
- {assume nn': "n < n'" hence n'p: "n' > 0" by simp
+ {assume nn': "n < n'" hence n'p: "n' > 0" by simp
hence headcnp':"head (CN c' n' p') = CN c' n' p'" by (cases n') simp_all
have degcnp': "degree (CN c' n' p') = 0" and degcnpeq: "degree (CN c n p) = degree (CN c' n' p')"
using 4 nn' by (cases n', simp_all)
@@ -1189,7 +1198,7 @@
hence headcnp: "head (CN c n p) = CN c n p" by (cases n) auto
from H(3) headcnp headcnp' nn' have ?case by auto}
moreover
- {assume nn': "n > n'" hence np: "n > 0" by simp
+ {assume nn': "n > n'" hence np: "n > 0" by simp
hence headcnp:"head (CN c n p) = CN c n p" by (cases n) simp_all
from 4 have degcnpeq: "degree (CN c' n' p') = degree (CN c n p)" by simp
from np have degcnp: "degree (CN c n p) = 0" by (cases n) simp_all
@@ -1198,7 +1207,7 @@
from H(3) headcnp headcnp' nn' have ?case by auto}
ultimately show ?case by blast
qed auto
-
+
lemma shift1_head : "isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> head (shift1 p) = head p"
by (induct p arbitrary: n0 rule: head.induct) (simp_all add: shift1_def)
@@ -1210,7 +1219,7 @@
case (Suc k n0 p)
hence "isnpolyh (shift1 p) 0" by (simp add: shift1_isnpolyh)
with Suc have "head (funpow k shift1 (shift1 p)) = head (shift1 p)"
- and "head (shift1 p) = head p" by (simp_all add: shift1_head)
+ and "head (shift1 p) = head p" by (simp_all add: shift1_head)
thus ?case by (simp add: funpow_swap1)
qed
@@ -1231,7 +1240,7 @@
lemma head_head[simp]: "isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> head (head p) = head p"
by (induct p rule: head.induct) auto
-lemma polyadd_eq_const_degree:
+lemma polyadd_eq_const_degree:
"isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> isnpolyh q n1 \<Longrightarrow> polyadd p q = C c \<Longrightarrow> degree p = degree q"
using polyadd_eq_const_degreen degree_eq_degreen0 by simp
@@ -1255,15 +1264,15 @@
apply (metis degree.simps(9) gr0_conv_Suc nat_less_le order_le_less_trans)
done
-lemma polymul_head_polyeq:
+lemma polymul_head_polyeq:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
shows "\<lbrakk>isnpolyh p n0; isnpolyh q n1 ; p \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p ; q \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> head (p *\<^sub>p q) = head p *\<^sub>p head q"
proof (induct p q arbitrary: n0 n1 rule: polymul.induct)
case (2 c c' n' p' n0 n1)
hence "isnpolyh (head (CN c' n' p')) n1" "isnormNum c" by (simp_all add: head_isnpolyh)
thus ?case using 2 by (cases n') auto
-next
- case (3 c n p c' n0 n1)
+next
+ case (3 c n p c' n0 n1)
hence "isnpolyh (head (CN c n p)) n0" "isnormNum c'" by (simp_all add: head_isnpolyh)
thus ?case using 3 by (cases n) auto
next
@@ -1272,8 +1281,8 @@
"isnpolyh (CN c n p) n" "isnpolyh (CN c' n' p') n'"
by simp_all
have "n < n' \<or> n' < n \<or> n = n'" by arith
- moreover
- {assume nn': "n < n'" hence ?case
+ moreover
+ {assume nn': "n < n'" hence ?case
using norm "4.hyps"(2)[OF norm(1,6)] "4.hyps"(1)[OF norm(2,6)]
apply simp
apply (cases n)
@@ -1283,7 +1292,7 @@
done }
moreover {assume nn': "n'< n"
hence ?case
- using norm "4.hyps"(6) [OF norm(5,3)] "4.hyps"(5)[OF norm(5,4)]
+ using norm "4.hyps"(6) [OF norm(5,3)] "4.hyps"(5)[OF norm(5,4)]
apply simp
apply (cases n')
apply simp
@@ -1291,14 +1300,14 @@
apply auto
done }
moreover {assume nn': "n' = n"
- from nn' polymul_normh[OF norm(5,4)]
+ from nn' polymul_normh[OF norm(5,4)]
have ncnpc':"isnpolyh (CN c n p *\<^sub>p c') n" by (simp add: min_def)
- from nn' polymul_normh[OF norm(5,3)] norm
+ from nn' polymul_normh[OF norm(5,3)] norm
have ncnpp':"isnpolyh (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p') n" by simp
from nn' ncnpp' polymul_eq0_iff[OF norm(5,3)] norm(6)
- have ncnpp0':"isnpolyh (CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p')) n" by simp
- from polyadd_normh[OF ncnpc' ncnpp0']
- have nth: "isnpolyh ((CN c n p *\<^sub>p c') +\<^sub>p (CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p'))) n"
+ have ncnpp0':"isnpolyh (CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p')) n" by simp
+ from polyadd_normh[OF ncnpc' ncnpp0']
+ have nth: "isnpolyh ((CN c n p *\<^sub>p c') +\<^sub>p (CN 0\<^sub>p n (CN c n p *\<^sub>p p'))) n"
by (simp add: min_def)
{assume np: "n > 0"
with nn' head_isnpolyh_Suc'[OF np nth]
@@ -1314,7 +1323,7 @@
from polyadd_head[OF ncnpc'[simplified nz] ncnpp0'[simplified nz] dth'] dth
have ?case using norm "4.hyps"(6)[OF norm(5,3)]
"4.hyps"(5)[OF norm(5,4)] nn' nz by simp }
- ultimately have ?case by (cases n) auto}
+ ultimately have ?case by (cases n) auto}
ultimately show ?case by blast
qed simp_all
@@ -1359,25 +1368,29 @@
and ns: "isnpolyh s n1"
and ap: "head p = a"
and ndp: "degree p = n" and pnz: "p \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
- shows "(polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k',r) \<longrightarrow> (k' \<ge> k) \<and> (degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p)
+ shows "(polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k',r) \<longrightarrow> (k' \<ge> k) \<and> (degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p)
\<and> (\<exists>nr. isnpolyh r nr) \<and> (\<exists>q n1. isnpolyh q n1 \<and> ((polypow (k' - k) a) *\<^sub>p s = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r)))"
using ns
proof (induct "degree s" arbitrary: s k k' r n1 rule: less_induct)
case less
let ?qths = "\<exists>q n1. isnpolyh q n1 \<and> (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r)"
- let ?ths = "polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k', r) \<longrightarrow> k \<le> k' \<and> (degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p)
+ let ?ths = "polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k', r) \<longrightarrow> k \<le> k' \<and> (degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p)
\<and> (\<exists>nr. isnpolyh r nr) \<and> ?qths"
let ?b = "head s"
let ?p' = "funpow (degree s - n) shift1 p"
let ?xdn = "funpow (degree s - n) shift1 (1)\<^sub>p"
let ?akk' = "a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k)"
note ns = `isnpolyh s n1`
- from np have np0: "isnpolyh p 0"
- using isnpolyh_mono[where n="n0" and n'="0" and p="p"] by simp
- have np': "isnpolyh ?p' 0" using funpow_shift1_isnpoly[OF np0[simplified isnpoly_def[symmetric]] pnz, where n="degree s - n"] isnpoly_def by simp
- have headp': "head ?p' = head p" using funpow_shift1_head[OF np pnz] by simp
- from funpow_shift1_isnpoly[where p="(1)\<^sub>p"] have nxdn: "isnpolyh ?xdn 0" by (simp add: isnpoly_def)
- from polypow_normh [OF head_isnpolyh[OF np0], where k="k' - k"] ap
+ from np have np0: "isnpolyh p 0"
+ using isnpolyh_mono[where n="n0" and n'="0" and p="p"] by simp
+ have np': "isnpolyh ?p' 0"
+ using funpow_shift1_isnpoly[OF np0[simplified isnpoly_def[symmetric]] pnz, where n="degree s - n"] isnpoly_def
+ by simp
+ have headp': "head ?p' = head p"
+ using funpow_shift1_head[OF np pnz] by simp
+ from funpow_shift1_isnpoly[where p="(1)\<^sub>p"] have nxdn: "isnpolyh ?xdn 0"
+ by (simp add: isnpoly_def)
+ from polypow_normh [OF head_isnpolyh[OF np0], where k="k' - k"] ap
have nakk':"isnpolyh ?akk' 0" by blast
{ assume sz: "s = 0\<^sub>p"
hence ?ths using np polydivide_aux.simps
@@ -1386,67 +1399,82 @@
apply simp
done }
moreover
- {assume sz: "s \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
- {assume dn: "degree s < n"
+ { assume sz: "s \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
+ { assume dn: "degree s < n"
hence "?ths" using ns ndp np polydivide_aux.simps
apply auto
apply (rule exI[where x="0\<^sub>p"])
apply simp
done }
- moreover
- {assume dn': "\<not> degree s < n" hence dn: "degree s \<ge> n" by arith
- have degsp': "degree s = degree ?p'"
+ moreover
+ { assume dn': "\<not> degree s < n" hence dn: "degree s \<ge> n" by arith
+ have degsp': "degree s = degree ?p'"
using dn ndp funpow_shift1_degree[where k = "degree s - n" and p="p"] by simp
- {assume ba: "?b = a"
- hence headsp': "head s = head ?p'" using ap headp' by simp
- have nr: "isnpolyh (s -\<^sub>p ?p') 0" using polysub_normh[OF ns np'] by simp
+ { assume ba: "?b = a"
+ hence headsp': "head s = head ?p'"
+ using ap headp' by simp
+ have nr: "isnpolyh (s -\<^sub>p ?p') 0"
+ using polysub_normh[OF ns np'] by simp
from degree_polysub_samehead[OF ns np' headsp' degsp']
have "degree (s -\<^sub>p ?p') < degree s \<or> s -\<^sub>p ?p' = 0\<^sub>p" by simp
- moreover
- {assume deglt:"degree (s -\<^sub>p ?p') < degree s"
+ moreover
+ { assume deglt:"degree (s -\<^sub>p ?p') < degree s"
from polydivide_aux.simps sz dn' ba
have eq: "polydivide_aux a n p k s = polydivide_aux a n p k (s -\<^sub>p ?p')"
by (simp add: Let_def)
- {assume h1: "polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k', r)"
- from less(1)[OF deglt nr, of k k' r]
- trans[OF eq[symmetric] h1]
- have kk': "k \<le> k'" and nr:"\<exists>nr. isnpolyh r nr" and dr: "degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p"
- and q1:"\<exists>q nq. isnpolyh q nq \<and> (a ^\<^sub>p k' - k *\<^sub>p (s -\<^sub>p ?p') = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r)" by auto
- from q1 obtain q n1 where nq: "isnpolyh q n1"
- and asp:"a^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p (s -\<^sub>p ?p') = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r" by blast
+ { assume h1: "polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k', r)"
+ from less(1)[OF deglt nr, of k k' r] trans[OF eq[symmetric] h1]
+ have kk': "k \<le> k'"
+ and nr:"\<exists>nr. isnpolyh r nr"
+ and dr: "degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p"
+ and q1: "\<exists>q nq. isnpolyh q nq \<and> (a ^\<^sub>p k' - k *\<^sub>p (s -\<^sub>p ?p') = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r)"
+ by auto
+ from q1 obtain q n1 where nq: "isnpolyh q n1"
+ and asp:"a^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p (s -\<^sub>p ?p') = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r" by blast
from nr obtain nr where nr': "isnpolyh r nr" by blast
- from polymul_normh[OF nakk' ns] have nakks': "isnpolyh (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) 0" by simp
+ from polymul_normh[OF nakk' ns] have nakks': "isnpolyh (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) 0"
+ by simp
from polyadd_normh[OF polymul_normh[OF nakk' nxdn] nq]
have nq': "isnpolyh (?akk' *\<^sub>p ?xdn +\<^sub>p q) 0" by simp
- from polyadd_normh[OF polymul_normh[OF np
+ from polyadd_normh[OF polymul_normh[OF np
polyadd_normh[OF polymul_normh[OF nakk' nxdn] nq]] nr']
- have nqr': "isnpolyh (p *\<^sub>p (?akk' *\<^sub>p ?xdn +\<^sub>p q) +\<^sub>p r) 0" by simp
- from asp have "\<forall> (bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p (s -\<^sub>p ?p')) =
+ have nqr': "isnpolyh (p *\<^sub>p (?akk' *\<^sub>p ?xdn +\<^sub>p q) +\<^sub>p r) 0"
+ by simp
+ from asp have "\<forall> (bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p (s -\<^sub>p ?p')) =
Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r)" by simp
- hence " \<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)*\<^sub>p s) =
- Ipoly bs (a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) * Ipoly bs ?p' + Ipoly bs p * Ipoly bs q + Ipoly bs r"
+ hence " \<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)*\<^sub>p s) =
+ Ipoly bs (a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) * Ipoly bs ?p' + Ipoly bs p * Ipoly bs q + Ipoly bs r"
by (simp add: field_simps)
- hence " \<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) =
- Ipoly bs (a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) * Ipoly bs (funpow (degree s - n) shift1 (1)\<^sub>p *\<^sub>p p)
- + Ipoly bs p * Ipoly bs q + Ipoly bs r"
- by (auto simp only: funpow_shift1_1)
- hence "\<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) =
- Ipoly bs p * (Ipoly bs (a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) * Ipoly bs (funpow (degree s - n) shift1 (1)\<^sub>p)
- + Ipoly bs q) + Ipoly bs r" by (simp add: field_simps)
- hence "\<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) =
- Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p ((a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) *\<^sub>p (funpow (degree s - n) shift1 (1)\<^sub>p) +\<^sub>p q) +\<^sub>p r)" by simp
+ hence " \<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) =
+ Ipoly bs (a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) * Ipoly bs (funpow (degree s - n) shift1 (1)\<^sub>p *\<^sub>p p) +
+ Ipoly bs p * Ipoly bs q + Ipoly bs r"
+ by (auto simp only: funpow_shift1_1)
+ hence "\<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) =
+ Ipoly bs p * (Ipoly bs (a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) * Ipoly bs (funpow (degree s - n) shift1 (1)\<^sub>p) +
+ Ipoly bs q) + Ipoly bs r"
+ by (simp add: field_simps)
+ hence "\<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) =
+ Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p ((a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) *\<^sub>p (funpow (degree s - n) shift1 (1)\<^sub>p) +\<^sub>p q) +\<^sub>p r)"
+ by simp
with isnpolyh_unique[OF nakks' nqr']
- have "a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s =
- p *\<^sub>p ((a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) *\<^sub>p (funpow (degree s - n) shift1 (1)\<^sub>p) +\<^sub>p q) +\<^sub>p r" by blast
+ have "a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s =
+ p *\<^sub>p ((a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) *\<^sub>p (funpow (degree s - n) shift1 (1)\<^sub>p) +\<^sub>p q) +\<^sub>p r"
+ by blast
hence ?qths using nq'
apply (rule_tac x="(a^\<^sub>p (k' - k)) *\<^sub>p (funpow (degree s - n) shift1 (1)\<^sub>p) +\<^sub>p q" in exI)
- apply (rule_tac x="0" in exI) by simp
+ apply (rule_tac x="0" in exI)
+ apply simp
+ done
with kk' nr dr have "k \<le> k' \<and> (degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p) \<and> (\<exists>nr. isnpolyh r nr) \<and> ?qths"
- by blast } hence ?ths by blast }
- moreover
- {assume spz:"s -\<^sub>p ?p' = 0\<^sub>p"
+ by blast
+ }
+ hence ?ths by blast
+ }
+ moreover
+ { assume spz:"s -\<^sub>p ?p' = 0\<^sub>p"
from spz isnpolyh_unique[OF polysub_normh[OF ns np'], where q="0\<^sub>p", symmetric, where ?'a = "'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero}"]
- have " \<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs s = Ipoly bs ?p'" by simp
+ have " \<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs s = Ipoly bs ?p'"
+ by simp
hence "\<forall>(bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs s = Ipoly bs (?xdn *\<^sub>p p)"
using np nxdn
apply simp
@@ -1455,134 +1483,162 @@
done
hence sp': "s = ?xdn *\<^sub>p p" using isnpolyh_unique[OF ns polymul_normh[OF nxdn np]]
by blast
- {assume h1: "polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k',r)"
+ { assume h1: "polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k',r)"
from polydivide_aux.simps sz dn' ba
have eq: "polydivide_aux a n p k s = polydivide_aux a n p k (s -\<^sub>p ?p')"
by (simp add: Let_def)
- also have "\<dots> = (k,0\<^sub>p)" using polydivide_aux.simps spz by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (k,0\<^sub>p)"
+ using polydivide_aux.simps spz by simp
finally have "(k',r) = (k,0\<^sub>p)" using h1 by simp
with sp'[symmetric] ns np nxdn polyadd_0(1)[OF polymul_normh[OF np nxdn]]
polyadd_0(2)[OF polymul_normh[OF np nxdn]] have ?ths
apply auto
- apply (rule exI[where x="?xdn"])
+ apply (rule exI[where x="?xdn"])
apply (auto simp add: polymul_commute[of p])
- done} }
- ultimately have ?ths by blast }
+ done
+ }
+ }
+ ultimately have ?ths by blast
+ }
moreover
- {assume ba: "?b \<noteq> a"
- from polysub_normh[OF polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np0, simplified ap] ns]
+ { assume ba: "?b \<noteq> a"
+ from polysub_normh[OF polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np0, simplified ap] ns]
polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] np']]
- have nth: "isnpolyh ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')) 0" by(simp add: min_def)
+ have nth: "isnpolyh ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')) 0"
+ by (simp add: min_def)
have nzths: "a *\<^sub>p s \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p" "?b *\<^sub>p ?p' \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
- using polymul_eq0_iff[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np0, simplified ap] ns]
+ using polymul_eq0_iff[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np0, simplified ap] ns]
polymul_eq0_iff[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] np']head_nz[OF np0] ap pnz sz head_nz[OF ns]
- funpow_shift1_nz[OF pnz] by simp_all
+ funpow_shift1_nz[OF pnz]
+ by simp_all
from polymul_head_polyeq[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np] ns] head_nz[OF np] sz ap head_head[OF np] pnz
polymul_head_polyeq[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] np'] head_nz [OF ns] sz funpow_shift1_nz[OF pnz, where n="degree s - n"]
- have hdth: "head (a *\<^sub>p s) = head (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')"
+ have hdth: "head (a *\<^sub>p s) = head (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')"
using head_head[OF ns] funpow_shift1_head[OF np pnz]
polymul_commute[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np] head_isnpolyh[OF ns]]
by (simp add: ap)
from polymul_degreen[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np] ns, where m="0"]
head_nz[OF np] pnz sz ap[symmetric]
funpow_shift1_nz[OF pnz, where n="degree s - n"]
- polymul_degreen[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] np', where m="0"] head_nz[OF ns]
+ polymul_degreen[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] np', where m="0"] head_nz[OF ns]
ndp dn
- have degth: "degree (a *\<^sub>p s) = degree (?b *\<^sub>p ?p') "
+ have degth: "degree (a *\<^sub>p s) = degree (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')"
by (simp add: degree_eq_degreen0[symmetric] funpow_shift1_degree)
- {assume dth: "degree ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')) < degree s"
- from polysub_normh[OF polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np] ns] polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns]np']]
- ap have nasbp': "isnpolyh ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')) 0" by simp
- {assume h1:"polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k', r)"
+ { assume dth: "degree ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')) < degree s"
+ from polysub_normh[OF polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np] ns]
+ polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns]np']] ap
+ have nasbp': "isnpolyh ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')) 0"
+ by simp
+ { assume h1:"polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k', r)"
from h1 polydivide_aux.simps sz dn' ba
have eq:"polydivide_aux a n p (Suc k) ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')) = (k',r)"
by (simp add: Let_def)
with less(1)[OF dth nasbp', of "Suc k" k' r]
- obtain q nq nr where kk': "Suc k \<le> k'" and nr: "isnpolyh r nr" and nq: "isnpolyh q nq"
+ obtain q nq nr where kk': "Suc k \<le> k'"
+ and nr: "isnpolyh r nr"
+ and nq: "isnpolyh q nq"
and dr: "degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p"
- and qr: "a ^\<^sub>p (k' - Suc k) *\<^sub>p ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')) = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r" by auto
+ and qr: "a ^\<^sub>p (k' - Suc k) *\<^sub>p ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p')) = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r"
+ by auto
from kk' have kk'':"Suc (k' - Suc k) = k' - k" by arith
- {fix bs:: "'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list"
-
- from qr isnpolyh_unique[OF polypow_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np], where k="k' - Suc k", simplified ap] nasbp', symmetric]
- have "Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - Suc k) *\<^sub>p ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p'))) = Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r)"
- by simp
- hence "Ipoly bs a ^ (Suc (k' - Suc k)) * Ipoly bs s =
- Ipoly bs p * Ipoly bs q + Ipoly bs a ^ (k' - Suc k) * Ipoly bs ?b * Ipoly bs ?p' + Ipoly bs r"
- by (simp add: field_simps)
- hence "Ipoly bs a ^ (k' - k) * Ipoly bs s =
- Ipoly bs p * Ipoly bs q + Ipoly bs a ^ (k' - Suc k) * Ipoly bs ?b * Ipoly bs ?xdn * Ipoly bs p + Ipoly bs r"
- by (simp add: kk'' funpow_shift1_1[where n="degree s - n" and p="p"])
- hence "Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) =
- Ipoly bs p * (Ipoly bs q + Ipoly bs a ^ (k' - Suc k) * Ipoly bs ?b * Ipoly bs ?xdn) + Ipoly bs r"
- by (simp add: field_simps)}
- hence ieq:"\<forall>(bs :: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) =
- Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p (q +\<^sub>p (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - Suc k) *\<^sub>p ?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn)) +\<^sub>p r)" by auto
+ {
+ fix bs:: "'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list"
+ from qr isnpolyh_unique[OF polypow_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np], where k="k' - Suc k", simplified ap] nasbp', symmetric]
+ have "Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - Suc k) *\<^sub>p ((a *\<^sub>p s) -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p'))) = Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r)"
+ by simp
+ hence "Ipoly bs a ^ (Suc (k' - Suc k)) * Ipoly bs s =
+ Ipoly bs p * Ipoly bs q + Ipoly bs a ^ (k' - Suc k) * Ipoly bs ?b * Ipoly bs ?p' + Ipoly bs r"
+ by (simp add: field_simps)
+ hence "Ipoly bs a ^ (k' - k) * Ipoly bs s =
+ Ipoly bs p * Ipoly bs q + Ipoly bs a ^ (k' - Suc k) * Ipoly bs ?b * Ipoly bs ?xdn * Ipoly bs p + Ipoly bs r"
+ by (simp add: kk'' funpow_shift1_1[where n="degree s - n" and p="p"])
+ hence "Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) =
+ Ipoly bs p * (Ipoly bs q + Ipoly bs a ^ (k' - Suc k) * Ipoly bs ?b * Ipoly bs ?xdn) + Ipoly bs r"
+ by (simp add: field_simps)
+ }
+ hence ieq:"\<forall>(bs :: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) =
+ Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p (q +\<^sub>p (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - Suc k) *\<^sub>p ?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn)) +\<^sub>p r)"
+ by auto
let ?q = "q +\<^sub>p (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - Suc k) *\<^sub>p ?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn)"
from polyadd_normh[OF nq polymul_normh[OF polymul_normh[OF polypow_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np], where k="k' - Suc k"] head_isnpolyh[OF ns], simplified ap ] nxdn]]
- have nqw: "isnpolyh ?q 0" by simp
+ have nqw: "isnpolyh ?q 0"
+ by simp
from ieq isnpolyh_unique[OF polymul_normh[OF polypow_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np], where k="k' - k"] ns, simplified ap] polyadd_normh[OF polymul_normh[OF np nqw] nr]]
- have asth: "(a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) = p *\<^sub>p (q +\<^sub>p (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - Suc k) *\<^sub>p ?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn)) +\<^sub>p r" by blast
- from dr kk' nr h1 asth nqw have ?ths apply simp
+ have asth: "(a ^\<^sub>p (k' - k) *\<^sub>p s) = p *\<^sub>p (q +\<^sub>p (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - Suc k) *\<^sub>p ?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn)) +\<^sub>p r"
+ by blast
+ from dr kk' nr h1 asth nqw have ?ths
+ apply simp
apply (rule conjI)
apply (rule exI[where x="nr"], simp)
apply (rule exI[where x="(q +\<^sub>p (a ^\<^sub>p (k' - Suc k) *\<^sub>p ?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn))"], simp)
apply (rule exI[where x="0"], simp)
- done}
- hence ?ths by blast }
- moreover
- {assume spz: "a *\<^sub>p s -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p') = 0\<^sub>p"
- {fix bs :: "'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list"
+ done
+ }
+ hence ?ths by blast
+ }
+ moreover
+ { assume spz: "a *\<^sub>p s -\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?p') = 0\<^sub>p"
+ {
+ fix bs :: "'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list"
from isnpolyh_unique[OF nth, where ?'a="'a" and q="0\<^sub>p",simplified,symmetric] spz
- have "Ipoly bs (a*\<^sub>p s) = Ipoly bs ?b * Ipoly bs ?p'" by simp
- hence "Ipoly bs (a*\<^sub>p s) = Ipoly bs (?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn) * Ipoly bs p"
- by (simp add: funpow_shift1_1[where n="degree s - n" and p="p"])
- hence "Ipoly bs (a*\<^sub>p s) = Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn))" by simp
- }
- hence hth: "\<forall> (bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a*\<^sub>p s) =
+ have "Ipoly bs (a*\<^sub>p s) = Ipoly bs ?b * Ipoly bs ?p'"
+ by simp
+ hence "Ipoly bs (a*\<^sub>p s) = Ipoly bs (?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn) * Ipoly bs p"
+ by (simp add: funpow_shift1_1[where n="degree s - n" and p="p"])
+ hence "Ipoly bs (a*\<^sub>p s) = Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn))"
+ by simp
+ }
+ hence hth: "\<forall> (bs:: 'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero} list). Ipoly bs (a*\<^sub>p s) =
Ipoly bs (p *\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn))" ..
- from hth
- have asq: "a *\<^sub>p s = p *\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn)"
- using isnpolyh_unique[where ?'a = "'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero}", OF polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np] ns]
+ from hth have asq: "a *\<^sub>p s = p *\<^sub>p (?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn)"
+ using isnpolyh_unique[where ?'a = "'a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero}", OF polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np] ns]
polymul_normh[OF np polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] nxdn]],
simplified ap] by simp
- {assume h1: "polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k', r)"
- from h1 sz ba dn' spz polydivide_aux.simps polydivide_aux.simps
- have "(k',r) = (Suc k, 0\<^sub>p)" by (simp add: Let_def)
- with h1 np head_isnpolyh[OF np, simplified ap] ns polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] nxdn]
- polymul_normh[OF np polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] nxdn]] asq
- have ?ths
- apply (clarsimp simp add: Let_def)
- apply (rule exI[where x="?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn"])
- apply simp
- apply (rule exI[where x="0"], simp)
- done }
- hence ?ths by blast }
+ { assume h1: "polydivide_aux a n p k s = (k', r)"
+ from h1 sz ba dn' spz polydivide_aux.simps polydivide_aux.simps
+ have "(k',r) = (Suc k, 0\<^sub>p)" by (simp add: Let_def)
+ with h1 np head_isnpolyh[OF np, simplified ap] ns polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] nxdn]
+ polymul_normh[OF np polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] nxdn]] asq
+ have ?ths
+ apply (clarsimp simp add: Let_def)
+ apply (rule exI[where x="?b *\<^sub>p ?xdn"])
+ apply simp
+ apply (rule exI[where x="0"], simp)
+ done
+ }
+ hence ?ths by blast
+ }
ultimately have ?ths
using degree_polysub_samehead[OF polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np0, simplified ap] ns] polymul_normh[OF head_isnpolyh[OF ns] np'] hdth degth] polymul_degreen[OF head_isnpolyh[OF np] ns, where m="0"]
head_nz[OF np] pnz sz ap[symmetric]
- by (simp add: degree_eq_degreen0[symmetric]) blast }
+ by (simp add: degree_eq_degreen0[symmetric]) blast
+ }
ultimately have ?ths by blast
}
- ultimately have ?ths by blast }
+ ultimately have ?ths by blast
+ }
ultimately show ?ths by blast
qed
-lemma polydivide_properties:
+lemma polydivide_properties:
assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::{field_char_0, field_inverse_zero})"
- and np: "isnpolyh p n0" and ns: "isnpolyh s n1" and pnz: "p \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
- shows "(\<exists> k r. polydivide s p = (k,r) \<and> (\<exists>nr. isnpolyh r nr) \<and> (degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p)
- \<and> (\<exists>q n1. isnpolyh q n1 \<and> ((polypow k (head p)) *\<^sub>p s = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r)))"
-proof-
- have trv: "head p = head p" "degree p = degree p" by simp_all
- from polydivide_def[where s="s" and p="p"]
- have ex: "\<exists> k r. polydivide s p = (k,r)" by auto
- then obtain k r where kr: "polydivide s p = (k,r)" by blast
+ and np: "isnpolyh p n0" and ns: "isnpolyh s n1" and pnz: "p \<noteq> 0\<^sub>p"
+ shows "\<exists>k r. polydivide s p = (k,r) \<and>
+ (\<exists>nr. isnpolyh r nr) \<and> (degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p) \<and>
+ (\<exists>q n1. isnpolyh q n1 \<and> ((polypow k (head p)) *\<^sub>p s = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r))"
+proof -
+ have trv: "head p = head p" "degree p = degree p"
+ by simp_all
+ from polydivide_def[where s="s" and p="p"] have ex: "\<exists> k r. polydivide s p = (k,r)"
+ by auto
+ then obtain k r where kr: "polydivide s p = (k,r)"
+ by blast
from trans[OF meta_eq_to_obj_eq[OF polydivide_def[where s="s"and p="p"], symmetric] kr]
polydivide_aux_properties[OF np ns trv pnz, where k="0" and k'="k" and r="r"]
have "(degree r = 0 \<or> degree r < degree p) \<and>
- (\<exists>nr. isnpolyh r nr) \<and> (\<exists>q n1. isnpolyh q n1 \<and> head p ^\<^sub>p k - 0 *\<^sub>p s = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r)" by blast
- with kr show ?thesis
+ (\<exists>nr. isnpolyh r nr) \<and> (\<exists>q n1. isnpolyh q n1 \<and> head p ^\<^sub>p k - 0 *\<^sub>p s = p *\<^sub>p q +\<^sub>p r)"
+ by blast
+ with kr show ?thesis
apply -
apply (rule exI[where x="k"])
apply (rule exI[where x="r"])
@@ -1596,23 +1652,23 @@
definition "isnonconstant p = (\<not> isconstant p)"
lemma isnonconstant_pnormal_iff:
- assumes nc: "isnonconstant p"
- shows "pnormal (polypoly bs p) \<longleftrightarrow> Ipoly bs (head p) \<noteq> 0"
+ assumes nc: "isnonconstant p"
+ shows "pnormal (polypoly bs p) \<longleftrightarrow> Ipoly bs (head p) \<noteq> 0"
proof
- let ?p = "polypoly bs p"
+ let ?p = "polypoly bs p"
assume H: "pnormal ?p"
have csz: "coefficients p \<noteq> []" using nc by (cases p) auto
-
- from coefficients_head[of p] last_map[OF csz, of "Ipoly bs"]
+
+ from coefficients_head[of p] last_map[OF csz, of "Ipoly bs"]
pnormal_last_nonzero[OF H]
show "Ipoly bs (head p) \<noteq> 0" by (simp add: polypoly_def)
next
assume h: "\<lparr>head p\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> \<noteq> 0"
let ?p = "polypoly bs p"
have csz: "coefficients p \<noteq> []" using nc by (cases p) auto
- hence pz: "?p \<noteq> []" by (simp add: polypoly_def)
+ hence pz: "?p \<noteq> []" by (simp add: polypoly_def)
hence lg: "length ?p > 0" by simp
- from h coefficients_head[of p] last_map[OF csz, of "Ipoly bs"]
+ from h coefficients_head[of p] last_map[OF csz, of "Ipoly bs"]
have lz: "last ?p \<noteq> 0" by (simp add: polypoly_def)
from pnormal_last_length[OF lg lz] show "pnormal ?p" .
qed
@@ -1638,10 +1694,10 @@
assume h: "\<lparr>head p\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> \<noteq> 0"
from isnonconstant_pnormal_iff[OF inc, of bs] h
have pn: "pnormal ?p" by blast
- {fix x assume H: "?p = [x]"
+ { fix x assume H: "?p = [x]"
from H have "length (coefficients p) = 1" unfolding polypoly_def by auto
- with isnonconstant_coefficients_length[OF inc] have False by arith}
- thus "nonconstant ?p" using pn unfolding nonconstant_def by blast
+ with isnonconstant_coefficients_length[OF inc] have False by arith }
+ thus "nonconstant ?p" using pn unfolding nonconstant_def by blast
qed
lemma pnormal_length: "p\<noteq>[] \<Longrightarrow> pnormal p \<longleftrightarrow> length (pnormalize p) = length p"
@@ -1655,29 +1711,29 @@
assumes inc: "isnonconstant p"
shows "degree p = Polynomial_List.degree (polypoly bs p) \<longleftrightarrow> \<lparr>head p\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> \<noteq> 0"
proof
- let ?p = "polypoly bs p"
+ let ?p = "polypoly bs p"
assume H: "degree p = Polynomial_List.degree ?p"
from isnonconstant_coefficients_length[OF inc] have pz: "?p \<noteq> []"
unfolding polypoly_def by auto
from H degree_coefficients[of p] isnonconstant_coefficients_length[OF inc]
have lg:"length (pnormalize ?p) = length ?p"
unfolding Polynomial_List.degree_def polypoly_def by simp
- hence "pnormal ?p" using pnormal_length[OF pz] by blast
- with isnonconstant_pnormal_iff[OF inc]
+ hence "pnormal ?p" using pnormal_length[OF pz] by blast
+ with isnonconstant_pnormal_iff[OF inc]
show "\<lparr>head p\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> \<noteq> 0" by blast
next
- let ?p = "polypoly bs p"
+ let ?p = "polypoly bs p"
assume H: "\<lparr>head p\<rparr>\<^sub>p\<^bsup>bs\<^esup> \<noteq> 0"
with isnonconstant_pnormal_iff[OF inc] have "pnormal ?p" by blast
with degree_coefficients[of p] isnonconstant_coefficients_length[OF inc]
- show "degree p = Polynomial_List.degree ?p"
+ show "degree p = Polynomial_List.degree ?p"
unfolding polypoly_def pnormal_def Polynomial_List.degree_def by auto
qed
-section{* Swaps ; Division by a certain variable *}
+section {* Swaps ; Division by a certain variable *}
-primrec swap:: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> poly \<Rightarrow> poly" where
+primrec swap :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> poly \<Rightarrow> poly" where
"swap n m (C x) = C x"
| "swap n m (Bound k) = Bound (if k = n then m else if k=m then n else k)"
| "swap n m (Neg t) = Neg (swap n m t)"
@@ -1685,8 +1741,8 @@
| "swap n m (Sub s t) = Sub (swap n m s) (swap n m t)"
| "swap n m (Mul s t) = Mul (swap n m s) (swap n m t)"
| "swap n m (Pw t k) = Pw (swap n m t) k"
-| "swap n m (CN c k p) = CN (swap n m c) (if k = n then m else if k=m then n else k)
- (swap n m p)"
+| "swap n m (CN c k p) =
+ CN (swap n m c) (if k = n then m else if k=m then n else k) (swap n m p)"
lemma swap:
assumes nbs: "n < length bs"
@@ -1694,10 +1750,10 @@
shows "Ipoly bs (swap n m t) = Ipoly ((bs[n:= bs!m])[m:= bs!n]) t"
proof (induct t)
case (Bound k)
- thus ?case using nbs mbs by simp
+ thus ?case using nbs mbs by simp
next
case (CN c k p)
- thus ?case using nbs mbs by simp
+ thus ?case using nbs mbs by simp
qed simp_all
lemma swap_swap_id [simp]: "swap n m (swap m n t) = t"
@@ -1723,9 +1779,9 @@
shows "isnpoly (swapnorm n m p)"
unfolding swapnorm_def by simp
-definition "polydivideby n s p =
+definition "polydivideby n s p =
(let ss = swapnorm 0 n s ; sp = swapnorm 0 n p ; h = head sp; (k,r) = polydivide ss sp
- in (k,swapnorm 0 n h,swapnorm 0 n r))"
+ in (k, swapnorm 0 n h,swapnorm 0 n r))"
lemma swap_nz [simp]: " (swap n m p = 0\<^sub>p) = (p = 0\<^sub>p)"
by (induct p) simp_all
@@ -1736,10 +1792,10 @@
| "isweaknpoly (CN c n p) \<longleftrightarrow> isweaknpoly c \<and> isweaknpoly p"
| "isweaknpoly p = False"
-lemma isnpolyh_isweaknpoly: "isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> isweaknpoly p"
+lemma isnpolyh_isweaknpoly: "isnpolyh p n0 \<Longrightarrow> isweaknpoly p"
by (induct p arbitrary: n0) auto
-lemma swap_isweanpoly: "isweaknpoly p \<Longrightarrow> isweaknpoly (swap n m p)"
+lemma swap_isweanpoly: "isweaknpoly p \<Longrightarrow> isweaknpoly (swap n m p)"
by (induct p) auto
end
\ No newline at end of file