--- a/src/HOL/Algebra/CRing.thy Fri Mar 14 12:03:23 2003 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Algebra/CRing.thy Fri Mar 14 18:00:16 2003 +0100
@@ -5,9 +5,7 @@
Copyright: Clemens Ballarin
*)
-header {* The algebraic hierarchy of rings as axiomatic classes *}
-
-theory CRing = Group
+theory CRing = Summation
files ("ringsimp.ML"):
section {* The Algebraic Hierarchy of Rings *}
@@ -37,7 +35,13 @@
divide_def: "a / b = a * inverse b"
power_def: "a ^ n = nat_rec 1 (%u b. b * a) n"
*)
-subsection {* Basic Facts *}
+
+locale "domain" = cring +
+ assumes one_not_zero [simp]: "\<one> ~= \<zero>"
+ and integral: "[| a \<otimes> b = \<zero>; a \<in> carrier R; b \<in> carrier R |] ==>
+ a = \<zero> | b = \<zero>"
+
+subsection {* Basic Facts of Rings *}
lemma (in cring) a_magma [simp, intro]:
"magma (| carrier = carrier R,
@@ -73,39 +77,42 @@
mult = add R, one = zero R, m_inv = a_inv R |)"
by (simp add: abelian_semigroup_def)
-lemma (in cring) a_abelian_group:
- "abelian_group (| carrier = carrier R,
- mult = add R, one = zero R, m_inv = a_inv R |)"
- by (simp add: abelian_group_def)
+lemmas group_record_simps = semigroup.simps monoid.simps group.simps
lemmas (in cring) a_closed [intro, simp] =
- magma.m_closed [OF a_magma, simplified]
+ magma.m_closed [OF a_magma, simplified group_record_simps]
lemmas (in cring) zero_closed [intro, simp] =
- l_one.one_closed [OF a_l_one, simplified]
+ l_one.one_closed [OF a_l_one, simplified group_record_simps]
lemmas (in cring) a_inv_closed [intro, simp] =
- group.inv_closed [OF a_group, simplified]
+ group.inv_closed [OF a_group, simplified group_record_simps]
lemma (in cring) minus_closed [intro, simp]:
"[| x \<in> carrier R; y \<in> carrier R |] ==> x \<ominus> y \<in> carrier R"
by (simp add: minus_def)
-lemmas (in cring) a_l_cancel [simp] = group.l_cancel [OF a_group, simplified]
+lemmas (in cring) a_l_cancel [simp] =
+ group.l_cancel [OF a_group, simplified group_record_simps]
-lemmas (in cring) a_r_cancel [simp] = group.r_cancel [OF a_group, simplified]
+lemmas (in cring) a_r_cancel [simp] =
+ group.r_cancel [OF a_group, simplified group_record_simps]
-lemmas (in cring) a_assoc = semigroup.m_assoc [OF a_semigroup, simplified]
+lemmas (in cring) a_assoc =
+ semigroup.m_assoc [OF a_semigroup, simplified group_record_simps]
-lemmas (in cring) l_zero [simp] = l_one.l_one [OF a_l_one, simplified]
+lemmas (in cring) l_zero [simp] =
+ l_one.l_one [OF a_l_one, simplified group_record_simps]
-lemmas (in cring) l_neg = group.l_inv [OF a_group, simplified]
+lemmas (in cring) l_neg =
+ group.l_inv [OF a_group, simplified group_record_simps]
-lemmas (in cring) a_comm = abelian_semigroup.m_comm [OF a_abelian_semigroup,
- simplified]
+lemmas (in cring) a_comm =
+ abelian_semigroup.m_comm [OF a_abelian_semigroup,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
lemmas (in cring) a_lcomm =
- abelian_semigroup.m_lcomm [OF a_abelian_semigroup, simplified]
+ abelian_semigroup.m_lcomm [OF a_abelian_semigroup, simplified group_record_simps]
lemma (in cring) r_zero [simp]:
"x \<in> carrier R ==> x \<oplus> \<zero> = x"
@@ -117,11 +124,12 @@
using group.r_inv [OF a_group]
by simp
-lemmas (in cring) minus_zero [simp] = group.inv_one [OF a_group, simplified]
+lemmas (in cring) minus_zero [simp] =
+ group.inv_one [OF a_group, simplified group_record_simps]
lemma (in cring) minus_minus [simp]:
"x \<in> carrier R ==> \<ominus> (\<ominus> x) = x"
- using group.inv_inv [OF a_group, simplified]
+ using group.inv_inv [OF a_group, simplified group_record_simps]
by simp
lemma (in cring) minus_add:
@@ -217,6 +225,8 @@
{* Method.ctxt_args cring_normalise *}
{* computes distributive normal form in commutative rings (locales version) *}
+text {* Two examples for use of method algebra *}
+
lemma
includes cring R + cring S
shows "[| a \<in> carrier R; b \<in> carrier R; c \<in> carrier S; d \<in> carrier S |] ==>
@@ -228,4 +238,225 @@
shows "[| a \<in> carrier R; b \<in> carrier R |] ==> a \<ominus> (a \<ominus> b) = b"
by algebra
+subsection {* Sums over Finite Sets *}
+
+text {*
+ This definition makes it easy to lift lemmas from @{term finprod}.
+*}
+
+constdefs
+ finsum :: "[('b, 'm) ring_scheme, 'a => 'b, 'a set] => 'b"
+ "finsum R f A == finprod (| carrier = carrier R,
+ mult = add R, one = zero R, m_inv = a_inv R |) f A"
+
+lemma (in cring) a_abelian_monoid:
+ "abelian_monoid (| carrier = carrier R,
+ mult = add R, one = zero R, m_inv = a_inv R |)"
+ by (simp add: abelian_monoid_def)
+
+(*
+ lemmas (in cring) finsum_empty [simp] =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_empty [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified]
+ is dangeous, because attributes (like simplified) are applied upon opening
+ the locale, simplified refers to the simpset at that time!!!
+*)
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_empty [simp] =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_empty [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_insert [simp] =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_insert [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_zero =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_one [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_closed [simp] =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_closed [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_Un_Int =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_Un_Int [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_Un_disjoint =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_Un_disjoint [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_addf =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_multf [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_cong =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_cong [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_0 [simp] =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_0 [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_Suc [simp] =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_Suc [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_Suc2 =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_Suc2 [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_add [simp] =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_mult [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+lemmas (in cring) finsum_cong' [cong] =
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_cong' [OF a_abelian_monoid, folded finsum_def,
+ simplified group_record_simps]
+
+(*
+lemma (in cring) finsum_empty [simp]:
+ "finsum R f {} = \<zero>"
+ by (simp add: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_empty [OF a_abelian_monoid])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_insert [simp]:
+ "[| finite F; a \<notin> F; f : F -> carrier R; f a \<in> carrier R |] ==>
+ finsum R f (insert a F) = f a \<oplus> finsum R f F"
+ by (simp add: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_insert [OF a_abelian_monoid])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_zero:
+ "finite A ==> finsum R (%i. \<zero>) A = \<zero>"
+ by (simp add: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_one [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_closed [simp]:
+ "[| finite A; f : A -> carrier R |] ==> finsum R f A \<in> carrier R"
+ by (simp only: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_closed [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_Un_Int:
+ "[| finite A; finite B; g \<in> A -> carrier R; g \<in> B -> carrier R |] ==>
+ finsum R g (A Un B) \<oplus> finsum R g (A Int B) =
+ finsum R g A \<oplus> finsum R g B"
+ by (simp only: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_Un_Int [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_Un_disjoint:
+ "[| finite A; finite B; A Int B = {};
+ g \<in> A -> carrier R; g \<in> B -> carrier R |]
+ ==> finsum R g (A Un B) = finsum R g A \<oplus> finsum R g B"
+ by (simp only: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_Un_disjoint [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_addf:
+ "[| finite A; f \<in> A -> carrier R; g \<in> A -> carrier R |] ==>
+ finsum R (%x. f x \<oplus> g x) A = (finsum R f A \<oplus> finsum R g A)"
+ by (simp only: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_multf [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_cong:
+ "[| A = B; g : B -> carrier R;
+ !!i. i : B ==> f i = g i |] ==> finsum R f A = finsum R g B"
+ apply (simp only: finsum_def)
+ apply (rule abelian_monoid.finprod_cong [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+ apply simp_all
+ done
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_0 [simp]:
+ "f \<in> {0::nat} -> carrier R ==> finsum R f {..0} = f 0"
+ by (simp add: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_0 [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_Suc [simp]:
+ "f \<in> {..Suc n} -> carrier R ==>
+ finsum R f {..Suc n} = (f (Suc n) \<oplus> finsum R f {..n})"
+ by (simp add: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_Suc [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_Suc2:
+ "f \<in> {..Suc n} -> carrier R ==>
+ finsum R f {..Suc n} = (finsum R (%i. f (Suc i)) {..n} \<oplus> f 0)"
+ by (simp only: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_Suc2 [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_add [simp]:
+ "[| f : {..n} -> carrier R; g : {..n} -> carrier R |] ==>
+ finsum R (%i. f i \<oplus> g i) {..n::nat} =
+ finsum R f {..n} \<oplus> finsum R g {..n}"
+ by (simp only: finsum_def
+ abelian_monoid.finprod_mult [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_cong' [cong]:
+ "[| A = B; !!i. i : B ==> f i = g i;
+ g \<in> B -> carrier R = True |] ==> finsum R f A = finsum R g B"
+ apply (simp only: finsum_def)
+ apply (rule abelian_monoid.finprod_cong' [OF a_abelian_monoid, simplified])
+ apply simp_all
+ done
+*)
+
+text {*Usually, if this rule causes a failed congruence proof error,
+ the reason is that the premise @{text "g \<in> B -> carrier G"} cannot be shown.
+ Adding @{thm [source] Pi_def} to the simpset is often useful. *}
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_ldistr:
+ "[| finite A; a \<in> carrier R; f \<in> A -> carrier R |] ==>
+ finsum R f A \<otimes> a = finsum R (%i. f i \<otimes> a) A"
+proof (induct set: Finites)
+ case empty then show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (insert F x) then show ?case by (simp add: Pi_def l_distr)
+qed
+
+lemma (in cring) finsum_rdistr:
+ "[| finite A; a \<in> carrier R; f \<in> A -> carrier R |] ==>
+ a \<otimes> finsum R f A = finsum R (%i. a \<otimes> f i) A"
+proof (induct set: Finites)
+ case empty then show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (insert F x) then show ?case by (simp add: Pi_def r_distr)
+qed
+
+subsection {* Facts of Integral Domains *}
+
+lemma (in "domain") zero_not_one [simp]:
+ "\<zero> ~= \<one>"
+ by (rule not_sym) simp
+
+lemma (in "domain") integral_iff: (* not by default a simp rule! *)
+ "[| a \<in> carrier R; b \<in> carrier R |] ==> (a \<otimes> b = \<zero>) = (a = \<zero> | b = \<zero>)"
+proof
+ assume "a \<in> carrier R" "b \<in> carrier R" "a \<otimes> b = \<zero>"
+ then show "a = \<zero> | b = \<zero>" by (simp add: integral)
+next
+ assume "a \<in> carrier R" "b \<in> carrier R" "a = \<zero> | b = \<zero>"
+ then show "a \<otimes> b = \<zero>" by auto
+qed
+
+lemma (in "domain") m_lcancel:
+ assumes prem: "a ~= \<zero>"
+ and R: "a \<in> carrier R" "b \<in> carrier R" "c \<in> carrier R"
+ shows "(a \<otimes> b = a \<otimes> c) = (b = c)"
+proof
+ assume eq: "a \<otimes> b = a \<otimes> c"
+ with R have "a \<otimes> (b \<ominus> c) = \<zero>" by algebra
+ with R have "a = \<zero> | (b \<ominus> c) = \<zero>" by (simp add: integral_iff)
+ with prem and R have "b \<ominus> c = \<zero>" by auto
+ with R have "b = b \<ominus> (b \<ominus> c)" by algebra
+ also from R have "b \<ominus> (b \<ominus> c) = c" by algebra
+ finally show "b = c" .
+next
+ assume "b = c" then show "a \<otimes> b = a \<otimes> c" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma (in "domain") m_rcancel:
+ assumes prem: "a ~= \<zero>"
+ and R: "a \<in> carrier R" "b \<in> carrier R" "c \<in> carrier R"
+ shows conc: "(b \<otimes> a = c \<otimes> a) = (b = c)"
+proof -
+ from prem and R have "(a \<otimes> b = a \<otimes> c) = (b = c)" by (rule m_lcancel)
+ with R show ?thesis by algebra
+qed
+
end
--- a/src/HOL/Algebra/Summation.thy Fri Mar 14 12:03:23 2003 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Algebra/Summation.thy Fri Mar 14 18:00:16 2003 +0100
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
This file is largely based on HOL/Finite_Set.thy.
*)
-theory FoldSet = Group:
+header {* Summation Operator *}
-section {* Summation operator *}
+theory Summation = Group:
(* Instantiation of LC from Finite_Set.thy is not possible,
because here we have explicit typing rules like x : carrier G.
@@ -293,18 +293,20 @@
by (simp add: foldD_Un_Int
left_commute LCD.foldD_closed [OF LCD.intro [of D]] Un_subset_iff)
-subsection {* A Product Operator for Finite Sets *}
+subsection {* Products over Finite Sets *}
-text {*
- Definition of product (or summation, if the monoid is written addivitively)
- operator.
-*}
+constdefs
+ finprod :: "[('b, 'm) monoid_scheme, 'a => 'b, 'a set] => 'b"
+ "finprod G f A == if finite A
+ then foldD (carrier G) (mult G o f) (one G) A
+ else arbitrary"
+(*
locale finite_prod = abelian_monoid + var prod +
defines "prod == (%f A. if finite A
then foldD (carrier G) (op \<otimes> o f) \<one> A
else arbitrary)"
-
+*)
(* TODO: nice syntax for the summation operator inside the locale
like \<Otimes>\<index> i\<in>A. f i, probably needs hand-coded translation *)
@@ -313,9 +315,9 @@
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_full_simp_tac; thy)) *}
-lemma (in finite_prod) prod_empty [simp]:
- "prod f {} = \<one>"
- by (simp add: prod_def)
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_empty [simp]:
+ "finprod G f {} = \<one>"
+ by (simp add: finprod_def)
ML_setup {*
@@ -325,11 +327,11 @@
declare funcsetI [intro]
funcset_mem [dest]
-lemma (in finite_prod) prod_insert [simp]:
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_insert [simp]:
"[| finite F; a \<notin> F; f \<in> F -> carrier G; f a \<in> carrier G |] ==>
- prod f (insert a F) = f a \<otimes> prod f F"
+ finprod G f (insert a F) = f a \<otimes> finprod G f F"
apply (rule trans)
- apply (simp add: prod_def)
+ apply (simp add: finprod_def)
apply (rule trans)
apply (rule LCD.foldD_insert [OF LCD.intro [of "insert a F"]])
apply simp
@@ -337,11 +339,11 @@
apply fast apply fast apply assumption
apply (fastsimp intro: m_closed)
apply simp+ apply fast
- apply (auto simp add: prod_def)
+ apply (auto simp add: finprod_def)
done
-lemma (in finite_prod) prod_one:
- "finite A ==> prod (%i. \<one>) A = \<one>"
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_one:
+ "finite A ==> finprod G (%i. \<one>) A = \<one>"
proof (induct set: Finites)
case empty show ?case by simp
next
@@ -350,29 +352,10 @@
with insert show ?case by simp
qed
-(*
-lemma prod_eq_0_iff [simp]:
- "finite F ==> (prod f F = 0) = (ALL a:F. f a = (0::nat))"
- by (induct set: Finites) auto
-
-lemma prod_SucD: "prod f A = Suc n ==> EX a:A. 0 < f a"
- apply (case_tac "finite A")
- prefer 2 apply (simp add: prod_def)
- apply (erule rev_mp)
- apply (erule finite_induct)
- apply auto
- done
-
-lemma card_eq_prod: "finite A ==> card A = prod (\<lambda>x. 1) A"
-*) -- {* Could allow many @{text "card"} proofs to be simplified. *}
-(*
- by (induct set: Finites) auto
-*)
-
-lemma (in finite_prod) prod_closed:
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_closed [simp]:
fixes A
assumes fin: "finite A" and f: "f \<in> A -> carrier G"
- shows "prod f A \<in> carrier G"
+ shows "finprod G f A \<in> carrier G"
using fin f
proof induct
case empty show ?case by simp
@@ -391,50 +374,33 @@
"(f \<in> A Un B -> C) = (f \<in> A -> C & f \<in> B -> C)"
by fast
-lemma (in finite_prod) prod_Un_Int:
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_Un_Int:
"[| finite A; finite B; g \<in> A -> carrier G; g \<in> B -> carrier G |] ==>
- prod g (A Un B) \<otimes> prod g (A Int B) = prod g A \<otimes> prod g B"
+ finprod G g (A Un B) \<otimes> finprod G g (A Int B) =
+ finprod G g A \<otimes> finprod G g B"
-- {* The reversed orientation looks more natural, but LOOPS as a simprule! *}
proof (induct set: Finites)
- case empty then show ?case by (simp add: prod_closed)
+ case empty then show ?case by (simp add: finprod_closed)
next
case (insert A a)
then have a: "g a \<in> carrier G" by fast
from insert have A: "g \<in> A -> carrier G" by fast
from insert A a show ?case
- by (simp add: ac Int_insert_left insert_absorb prod_closed
+ by (simp add: ac Int_insert_left insert_absorb finprod_closed
Int_mono2 Un_subset_iff)
qed
-lemma (in finite_prod) prod_Un_disjoint:
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_Un_disjoint:
"[| finite A; finite B; A Int B = {};
g \<in> A -> carrier G; g \<in> B -> carrier G |]
- ==> prod g (A Un B) = prod g A \<otimes> prod g B"
- apply (subst prod_Un_Int [symmetric])
- apply (auto simp add: prod_closed)
+ ==> finprod G g (A Un B) = finprod G g A \<otimes> finprod G g B"
+ apply (subst finprod_Un_Int [symmetric])
+ apply (auto simp add: finprod_closed)
done
-(*
-lemma prod_UN_disjoint:
- fixes f :: "'a => 'b::plus_ac0"
- shows
- "finite I ==> (ALL i:I. finite (A i)) ==>
- (ALL i:I. ALL j:I. i \<noteq> j --> A i Int A j = {}) ==>
- prod f (UNION I A) = prod (\<lambda>i. prod f (A i)) I"
- apply (induct set: Finites)
- apply simp
- apply atomize
- apply (subgoal_tac "ALL i:F. x \<noteq> i")
- prefer 2 apply blast
- apply (subgoal_tac "A x Int UNION F A = {}")
- prefer 2 apply blast
- apply (simp add: prod_Un_disjoint)
- done
-*)
-
-lemma (in finite_prod) prod_addf:
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_multf:
"[| finite A; f \<in> A -> carrier G; g \<in> A -> carrier G |] ==>
- prod (%x. f x \<otimes> g x) A = (prod f A \<otimes> prod g A)"
+ finprod G (%x. f x \<otimes> g x) A = (finprod G f A \<otimes> finprod G g A)"
proof (induct set: Finites)
case empty show ?case by simp
next
@@ -447,138 +413,85 @@
from insert have fgA: "(%x. f x \<otimes> g x) : A -> carrier G"
by (simp add: Pi_def)
show ?case (* check if all simps are really necessary *)
- by (simp add: insert fA fa gA ga fgA fga ac prod_closed Int_insert_left insert_absorb Int_mono2 Un_subset_iff)
+ by (simp add: insert fA fa gA ga fgA fga ac finprod_closed Int_insert_left insert_absorb Int_mono2 Un_subset_iff)
qed
-(*
-lemma prod_Un: "finite A ==> finite B ==>
- (prod f (A Un B) :: nat) = prod f A + prod f B - prod f (A Int B)"
- apply (subst prod_Un_Int [symmetric])
- apply auto
- done
-
-lemma prod_diff1: "(prod f (A - {a}) :: nat) =
- (if a:A then prod f A - f a else prod f A)"
- apply (case_tac "finite A")
- prefer 2 apply (simp add: prod_def)
- apply (erule finite_induct)
- apply (auto simp add: insert_Diff_if)
- apply (drule_tac a = a in mk_disjoint_insert)
- apply auto
- done
-*)
-
-text {*
- Congruence rule. The simplifier requires the rule to be in this form.
-*}
-(*
-lemma (in finite_prod) prod_cong [cong]:
- "[| A = B; !!i. i \<in> B ==> f i = g i;
- g \<in> B -> carrier G = True |] ==> prod f A = prod g B"
-*)
-lemma (in finite_prod) prod_cong:
- "[| A = B; g \<in> B -> carrier G;
- !!i. i \<in> B ==> f i = g i |] ==> prod f A = prod g B"
-
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_cong:
+ "[| A = B; g : B -> carrier G;
+ !!i. i : B ==> f i = g i |] ==> finprod G f A = finprod G g B"
proof -
- assume prems: "A = B"
- "!!i. i \<in> B ==> f i = g i"
- "g \<in> B -> carrier G"
+ assume prems: "A = B" "g : B -> carrier G"
+ "!!i. i : B ==> f i = g i"
show ?thesis
proof (cases "finite B")
case True
- then have "!!A. [| A = B; g \<in> B -> carrier G;
- !!i. i \<in> B ==> f i = g i |] ==> prod f A = prod g B"
+ then have "!!A. [| A = B; g : B -> carrier G;
+ !!i. i : B ==> f i = g i |] ==> finprod G f A = finprod G g B"
proof induct
case empty thus ?case by simp
next
case (insert B x)
- then have "prod f A = prod f (insert x B)" by simp
- also from insert have "... = f x \<otimes> prod f B"
- proof (intro prod_insert)
+ then have "finprod G f A = finprod G f (insert x B)" by simp
+ also from insert have "... = f x \<otimes> finprod G f B"
+ proof (intro finprod_insert)
show "finite B" .
next
- show "x \<notin> B" .
+ show "x ~: B" .
next
- assume "x \<notin> B" "!!i. i \<in> insert x B \<Longrightarrow> f i = g i"
+ assume "x ~: B" "!!i. i \<in> insert x B \<Longrightarrow> f i = g i"
"g \<in> insert x B \<rightarrow> carrier G"
- thus "f \<in> B -> carrier G" by fastsimp
+ thus "f : B -> carrier G" by fastsimp
next
assume "x ~: B" "!!i. i \<in> insert x B \<Longrightarrow> f i = g i"
"g \<in> insert x B \<rightarrow> carrier G"
thus "f x \<in> carrier G" by fastsimp
qed
- also from insert have "... = g x \<otimes> prod g B" by fastsimp
- also from insert have "... = prod g (insert x B)"
- by (intro prod_insert [THEN sym]) auto
+ also from insert have "... = g x \<otimes> finprod G g B" by fastsimp
+ also from insert have "... = finprod G g (insert x B)"
+ by (intro finprod_insert [THEN sym]) auto
finally show ?case .
qed
with prems show ?thesis by simp
next
- case False with prems show ?thesis by (simp add: prod_def)
+ case False with prems show ?thesis by (simp add: finprod_def)
qed
qed
-lemma (in finite_prod) prod_cong1 [cong]:
- "[| A = B; !!i. i \<in> B ==> f i = g i;
- g \<in> B -> carrier G = True |] ==> prod f A = prod g B"
- by (rule prod_cong) fast+
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_cong' [cong]:
+ "[| A = B; !!i. i : B ==> f i = g i;
+ g : B -> carrier G = True |] ==> finprod G f A = finprod G g B"
+ by (rule finprod_cong) fast+
-text {*
- Usually, if this rule causes a failed congruence proof error,
- the reason is that the premise @{text "g \<in> B -> carrier G"} could not
- be shown. Adding @{thm [source] Pi_def} to the simpset is often useful.
-*}
+text {*Usually, if this rule causes a failed congruence proof error,
+ the reason is that the premise @{text "g : B -> carrier G"} cannot be shown.
+ Adding @{thm [source] Pi_def} to the simpset is often useful. *}
declare funcsetI [rule del]
funcset_mem [rule del]
-subsection {* Summation over the integer interval @{term "{..n}"} *}
-
-text {*
- A new locale where the index set is restricted to @{term "nat"} is
- necessary, because currently locales demand types in theorems to be as
- general as in the locale's definition.
-*}
-
-locale finite_prod_nat = finite_prod +
- assumes "False ==> prod f (A::nat set) = prod f A"
-
-lemma (in finite_prod_nat) natSum_0 [simp]:
- "f \<in> {0::nat} -> carrier G ==> prod f {..0} = f 0"
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_0 [simp]:
+ "f : {0::nat} -> carrier G ==> finprod G f {..0} = f 0"
by (simp add: Pi_def)
-lemma (in finite_prod_nat) natsum_Suc [simp]:
- "f \<in> {..Suc n} -> carrier G ==>
- prod f {..Suc n} = (f (Suc n) \<otimes> prod f {..n})"
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_Suc [simp]:
+ "f : {..Suc n} -> carrier G ==>
+ finprod G f {..Suc n} = (f (Suc n) \<otimes> finprod G f {..n})"
by (simp add: Pi_def atMost_Suc)
-lemma (in finite_prod_nat) natsum_Suc2:
- "f \<in> {..Suc n} -> carrier G ==>
- prod f {..Suc n} = (prod (%i. f (Suc i)) {..n} \<otimes> f 0)"
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_Suc2:
+ "f : {..Suc n} -> carrier G ==>
+ finprod G f {..Suc n} = (finprod G (%i. f (Suc i)) {..n} \<otimes> f 0)"
proof (induct n)
case 0 thus ?case by (simp add: Pi_def)
next
- case Suc thus ?case by (simp add: m_assoc Pi_def prod_closed)
+ case Suc thus ?case by (simp add: m_assoc Pi_def finprod_closed)
qed
-lemma (in finite_prod_nat) natsum_zero [simp]:
- "prod (%i. \<one>) {..n::nat} = \<one>"
-by (induct n) (simp_all add: Pi_def)
-
-lemma (in finite_prod_nat) natsum_add [simp]:
- "[| f \<in> {..n} -> carrier G; g \<in> {..n} -> carrier G |] ==>
- prod (%i. f i \<otimes> g i) {..n::nat} = prod f {..n} \<otimes> prod g {..n}"
-by (induct n) (simp_all add: ac Pi_def prod_closed)
-
-ML_setup {*
-
-Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
- simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_full_simp_tac; thy)) *}
-
-ML_setup {*
-
-Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
- simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_simp_tac; thy)) *}
+lemma (in abelian_monoid) finprod_mult [simp]:
+ "[| f : {..n} -> carrier G; g : {..n} -> carrier G |] ==>
+ finprod G (%i. f i \<otimes> g i) {..n::nat} =
+ finprod G f {..n} \<otimes> finprod G g {..n}"
+ by (induct n) (simp_all add: ac Pi_def finprod_closed)
end
+