more position information;
authorwenzelm
Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:30:57 +0100
changeset 59755 f8d164ab0dc1
parent 59754 696d87036f04
child 59756 96abba46955f
more position information;
src/CCL/CCL.thy
src/CCL/Wfd.thy
src/CTT/CTT.thy
src/Doc/Implementation/Tactic.thy
src/Doc/Tutorial/Protocol/Message.thy
src/FOL/FOL.thy
src/HOL/Auth/Message.thy
src/HOL/Bali/AxExample.thy
src/HOL/Bali/Basis.thy
src/HOL/HOLCF/IOA/meta_theory/Sequence.thy
src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/Domain/domain_induction.ML
src/HOL/Prolog/prolog.ML
src/HOL/SET_Protocol/Message_SET.thy
src/HOL/TLA/TLA.thy
src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Proof_Reconstruction.thy
src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_fact.ML
src/HOL/Tools/TFL/post.ML
src/HOL/UNITY/UNITY_tactics.ML
src/LCF/LCF.thy
src/Pure/Tools/rule_insts.ML
src/Sequents/LK0.thy
src/Tools/induct_tacs.ML
src/ZF/Tools/induct_tacs.ML
src/ZF/UNITY/SubstAx.thy
src/ZF/ind_syntax.ML
--- a/src/CCL/CCL.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/CCL/CCL.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@
 
 method_setup eq_coinduct3 = {*
   Scan.lift Args.name_inner_syntax >> (fn s => fn ctxt =>
-    SIMPLE_METHOD' (res_inst_tac ctxt [(("R", 0), s)] @{thm eq_coinduct3}))
+    SIMPLE_METHOD' (res_inst_tac ctxt [((("R", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm eq_coinduct3}))
 *}
 
 
--- a/src/CCL/Wfd.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/CCL/Wfd.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@
 method_setup wfd_strengthen = {*
   Scan.lift Args.name_inner_syntax >> (fn s => fn ctxt =>
     SIMPLE_METHOD' (fn i =>
-      res_inst_tac ctxt [(("Q", 0), s)] @{thm wfd_strengthen_lemma} i THEN assume_tac ctxt (i+1)))
+      res_inst_tac ctxt [((("Q", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm wfd_strengthen_lemma} i
+        THEN assume_tac ctxt (i + 1)))
 *}
 
 lemma wf_anti_sym: "\<lbrakk>Wfd(r); <a,x>:r; <x,a>:r\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P"
@@ -430,11 +431,12 @@
 fun IHinst tac rls = SUBGOAL (fn (Bi,i) =>
   let val bvs = bvars Bi []
       val ihs = filter could_IH (Logic.strip_assums_hyp Bi)
-      val rnames = map (fn x=>
+      val rnames = map (fn x =>
                     let val (a,b) = get_bno [] 0 x
                     in (nth bvs a, b) end) ihs
       fun try_IHs [] = no_tac
-        | try_IHs ((x,y)::xs) = tac [(("g", 0), x)] (nth rls (y - 1)) i ORELSE (try_IHs xs)
+        | try_IHs ((x,y)::xs) =
+            tac [((("g", 0), Position.none), x)] (nth rls (y - 1)) i ORELSE (try_IHs xs)
   in try_IHs rnames end)
 
 fun is_rigid_prog t =
--- a/src/CTT/CTT.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/CTT/CTT.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -421,13 +421,13 @@
     The (rtac EqE i) lets them apply to equality judgements. **)
 
 fun NE_tac ctxt sp i =
-  TRY (rtac @{thm EqE} i) THEN res_inst_tac ctxt [(("p", 0), sp)] @{thm NE} i
+  TRY (rtac @{thm EqE} i) THEN res_inst_tac ctxt [((("p", 0), Position.none), sp)] @{thm NE} i
 
 fun SumE_tac ctxt sp i =
-  TRY (rtac @{thm EqE} i) THEN res_inst_tac ctxt [(("p", 0), sp)] @{thm SumE} i
+  TRY (rtac @{thm EqE} i) THEN res_inst_tac ctxt [((("p", 0), Position.none), sp)] @{thm SumE} i
 
 fun PlusE_tac ctxt sp i =
-  TRY (rtac @{thm EqE} i) THEN res_inst_tac ctxt [(("p", 0), sp)] @{thm PlusE} i
+  TRY (rtac @{thm EqE} i) THEN res_inst_tac ctxt [((("p", 0), Position.none), sp)] @{thm PlusE} i
 
 (** Predicate logic reasoning, WITH THINNING!!  Procedures adapted from NJ. **)
 
--- a/src/Doc/Implementation/Tactic.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Doc/Implementation/Tactic.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -394,10 +394,14 @@
 
 text %mlref \<open>
   \begin{mldecls}
-  @{index_ML res_inst_tac: "Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic"} \\
-  @{index_ML eres_inst_tac: "Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic"} \\
-  @{index_ML dres_inst_tac: "Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic"} \\
-  @{index_ML forw_inst_tac: "Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic"} \\
+  @{index_ML res_inst_tac: "Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic"} \\
+  @{index_ML eres_inst_tac: "Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic"} \\
+  @{index_ML dres_inst_tac: "Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic"} \\
+  @{index_ML forw_inst_tac: "Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic"} \\
   @{index_ML subgoal_tac: "Proof.context -> string -> int -> tactic"} \\
   @{index_ML thin_tac: "Proof.context -> string -> int -> tactic"} \\
   @{index_ML rename_tac: "string list -> int -> tactic"} \\
--- a/src/Doc/Tutorial/Protocol/Message.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Doc/Tutorial/Protocol/Message.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@
      (EVERY 
       [  (*push in occurrences of X...*)
        (REPEAT o CHANGED)
-           (res_inst_tac ctxt [(("x", 1), "X")] (insert_commute RS ssubst) 1),
+           (res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 1), Position.none), "X")] (insert_commute RS ssubst) 1),
        (*...allowing further simplifications*)
        simp_tac ctxt 1,
        REPEAT (FIRSTGOAL (resolve_tac ctxt [allI,impI,notI,conjI,iffI])),
--- a/src/FOL/FOL.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/FOL/FOL.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@
   done
 
 ML {*
-  fun case_tac ctxt a = res_inst_tac ctxt [(("P", 0), a)] @{thm case_split}
+  fun case_tac ctxt a =
+    res_inst_tac ctxt [((("P", 0), Position.none), a)] @{thm case_split}
 *}
 
 method_setup case_tac = {*
--- a/src/HOL/Auth/Message.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Auth/Message.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@
      (EVERY 
       [  (*push in occurrences of X...*)
        (REPEAT o CHANGED)
-           (res_inst_tac ctxt [(("x", 1), "X")] (insert_commute RS ssubst) 1),
+           (res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 1), Position.none), "X")] (insert_commute RS ssubst) 1),
        (*...allowing further simplifications*)
        simp_tac ctxt 1,
        REPEAT (FIRSTGOAL (resolve_tac ctxt [allI,impI,notI,conjI,iffI])),
--- a/src/HOL/Bali/AxExample.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Bali/AxExample.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
 ML {*
 fun inst1_tac ctxt s t xs st =
   (case AList.lookup (op =) (rev (Term.add_var_names (Thm.prop_of st) [])) s of
-    SOME i => Rule_Insts.instantiate_tac ctxt [((s, i), t)] xs st
+    SOME i => Rule_Insts.instantiate_tac ctxt [(((s, i), Position.none), t)] xs st
   | NONE => Seq.empty);
 
 fun ax_tac ctxt =
--- a/src/HOL/Bali/Basis.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Bali/Basis.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
 fun sum3_instantiate ctxt thm =
   map (fn s =>
     simplify (ctxt delsimps @{thms not_None_eq})
-      (Rule_Insts.read_instantiate ctxt [(("t", 0), "In" ^ s ^ " x")] ["x"] thm))
+      (Rule_Insts.read_instantiate ctxt [((("t", 0), Position.none), "In" ^ s ^ " x")] ["x"] thm))
     ["1l","2","3","1r"]
 *}
 (* e.g. lemmas is_stmt_rews = is_stmt_def [of "In1l x", simplified] *)
--- a/src/HOL/HOLCF/IOA/meta_theory/Sequence.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/HOLCF/IOA/meta_theory/Sequence.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@
 ML {*
 
 fun Seq_case_tac ctxt s i =
-  res_inst_tac ctxt [(("x", 0), s)] @{thm Seq_cases} i
+  res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm Seq_cases} i
   THEN hyp_subst_tac ctxt i THEN hyp_subst_tac ctxt (i+1) THEN hyp_subst_tac ctxt (i+2);
 
 (* on a>>s only simp_tac, as full_simp_tac is uncomplete and often causes errors *)
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@
 
 (* rws are definitions to be unfolded for admissibility check *)
 fun Seq_induct_tac ctxt s rws i =
-  res_inst_tac ctxt [(("x", 0), s)] @{thm Seq_induct} i
+  res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm Seq_induct} i
   THEN (REPEAT_DETERM (CHANGED (asm_simp_tac ctxt (i+1))))
   THEN simp_tac (ctxt addsimps rws) i;
 
@@ -1102,12 +1102,12 @@
   THEN (REPEAT_DETERM (CHANGED (asm_simp_tac ctxt i)));
 
 fun pair_tac ctxt s =
-  res_inst_tac ctxt [(("p", 0), s)] @{thm PairE}
+  res_inst_tac ctxt [((("p", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm PairE}
   THEN' hyp_subst_tac ctxt THEN' asm_full_simp_tac ctxt;
 
 (* induction on a sequence of pairs with pairsplitting and simplification *)
 fun pair_induct_tac ctxt s rws i =
-  res_inst_tac ctxt [(("x", 0), s)] @{thm Seq_induct} i
+  res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm Seq_induct} i
   THEN pair_tac ctxt "a" (i+3)
   THEN (REPEAT_DETERM (CHANGED (simp_tac ctxt (i+1))))
   THEN simp_tac (ctxt addsimps rws) i;
--- a/src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/Domain/domain_induction.ML	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/Domain/domain_induction.ML	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@
   val take_ss =
     simpset_of (put_simpset HOL_ss @{context} addsimps (@{thm Rep_cfun_strict1} :: take_rews))
   fun quant_tac ctxt i = EVERY
-    (map (fn name => res_inst_tac ctxt [(("x", 0), name)] spec i) x_names)
+    (map (fn name => res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), name)] spec i) x_names)
 
   (* FIXME: move this message to domain_take_proofs.ML *)
   val is_finite = #is_finite take_info
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
             asm_simp_tac (put_simpset take_ss ctxt) 1 THEN
             (resolve_tac ctxt prems' THEN_ALL_NEW etac spec) 1
           fun cases_tacs (cons, exhaust) =
-            res_inst_tac ctxt [(("y", 0), "x")] exhaust 1 ::
+            res_inst_tac ctxt [((("y", 0), Position.none), "x")] exhaust 1 ::
             asm_simp_tac (put_simpset take_ss ctxt addsimps prems) 1 ::
             map con_tac cons
           val tacs = tacs1 @ maps cases_tacs (conss ~~ exhausts)
--- a/src/HOL/Prolog/prolog.ML	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Prolog/prolog.ML	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -53,8 +53,9 @@
   let
     fun at  thm = case Thm.concl_of thm of
       _$(Const(@{const_name All} ,_)$Abs(s,_,_))=>
-        let val s' = if s="P" then "PP" else s
-        in at(thm RS (Rule_Insts.read_instantiate ctxt [(("x", 0), s')] [s'] spec)) end
+        let val s' = if s="P" then "PP" else s in
+          at(thm RS (Rule_Insts.read_instantiate ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), s')] [s'] spec))
+        end
     | _$(Const(@{const_name HOL.conj},_)$_$_)       => at(thm RS conjunct1)@at(thm RS conjunct2)
     | _$(Const(@{const_name HOL.implies},_)$_$_)     => at(thm RS mp)
     | _                             => [thm]
--- a/src/HOL/SET_Protocol/Message_SET.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/SET_Protocol/Message_SET.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@
      (EVERY
       [  (*push in occurrences of X...*)
        (REPEAT o CHANGED)
-           (res_inst_tac ctxt [(("x", 1), "X")] (insert_commute RS ssubst) 1),
+           (res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 1), Position.none), "X")] (insert_commute RS ssubst) 1),
        (*...allowing further simplifications*)
        simp_tac ctxt 1,
        REPEAT (FIRSTGOAL (resolve_tac ctxt [allI,impI,notI,conjI,iffI])),
--- a/src/HOL/TLA/TLA.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/TLA/TLA.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -299,16 +299,16 @@
    REPEAT_DETERM (EVERY [etac @{thm box_conjE} i, atac i, etac @{thm box_thin} i])
 
 fun merge_temp_box_tac ctxt i =
-   REPEAT_DETERM (EVERY [etac @{thm box_conjE_temp} i, atac i,
-                         eres_inst_tac ctxt [(("'a", 0), "behavior")] @{thm box_thin} i])
+  REPEAT_DETERM (EVERY [etac @{thm box_conjE_temp} i, atac i,
+    eres_inst_tac ctxt [((("'a", 0), Position.none), "behavior")] @{thm box_thin} i])
 
 fun merge_stp_box_tac ctxt i =
-   REPEAT_DETERM (EVERY [etac @{thm box_conjE_stp} i, atac i,
-                         eres_inst_tac ctxt [(("'a", 0), "state")] @{thm box_thin} i])
+  REPEAT_DETERM (EVERY [etac @{thm box_conjE_stp} i, atac i,
+    eres_inst_tac ctxt [((("'a", 0), Position.none), "state")] @{thm box_thin} i])
 
 fun merge_act_box_tac ctxt i =
-   REPEAT_DETERM (EVERY [etac @{thm box_conjE_act} i, atac i,
-                         eres_inst_tac ctxt [(("'a", 0), "state * state")] @{thm box_thin} i])
+  REPEAT_DETERM (EVERY [etac @{thm box_conjE_act} i, atac i,
+    eres_inst_tac ctxt [((("'a", 0), Position.none), "state * state")] @{thm box_thin} i])
 *}
 
 method_setup merge_box = {* Scan.succeed (K (SIMPLE_METHOD' merge_box_tac)) *}
--- a/src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Proof_Reconstruction.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Proof_Reconstruction.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@
     else
       let
         fun instantiate param =
-           (map (eres_inst_tac ctxt [(("x", 0), param)]) thms
+           (map (eres_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), param)]) thms
                    |> FIRST')
         val attempts = map instantiate parameters
       in
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@
     else
       let
         fun instantiates param =
-           eres_inst_tac ctxt [(("x", 0), param)] thm
+           eres_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), param)] thm
 
         val quantified_var = head_quantified_variable ctxt i st
       in
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@
     fun instantiate_vars ctxt vars : tactic =
       map (fn var =>
             Rule_Insts.eres_inst_tac ctxt
-             [(("x", 0), var)] @{thm allE} 1)
+             [((("x", 0), Position.none), var)] @{thm allE} 1)
           vars
       |> EVERY
 
@@ -673,7 +673,8 @@
     else
       let
         fun instantiate const_name =
-          dres_inst_tac ctxt [(("sk", 0), const_name ^ parameters)] @{thm leo2_skolemise}
+          dres_inst_tac ctxt [((("sk", 0), Position.none), const_name ^ parameters)]
+            @{thm leo2_skolemise}
         val attempts = map instantiate candidate_consts
       in
         (fold (curry (op APPEND')) attempts (K no_tac)) i st
@@ -1556,7 +1557,7 @@
 
     val tecs =
       map (fn t_s =>
-       eres_inst_tac @{context} [(("x", 0), t_s)] @{thm allE}
+       eres_inst_tac @{context} [((("x", 0), Position.none), t_s)] @{thm allE}
        THEN' atac)
   in
     (TRY o etac @{thm forall_pos_lift})
@@ -1735,7 +1736,8 @@
               member (op =)  (Term.add_frees hyp_body []) (hd hyp_prefix) then
               no_tac st
             else
-              eres_inst_tac ctxt [(("x", 0), "(@X. False)")] @{thm allE} i st
+              eres_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), "(@X. False)")]
+                @{thm allE} i st
           end
      end
   end
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_fact.ML	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_fact.ML	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@
       |> hackish_string_of_term ctxt
   in
     ((fn () => name () ^ "[where " ^ p_name ^ " = " ^ quote p_inst ^ "]", stature),
-     th |> Rule_Insts.read_instantiate ctxt [((p_name, 0), p_inst)] [])
+     th |> Rule_Insts.read_instantiate ctxt [(((p_name, 0), Position.none), p_inst)] [])
   end
 
 fun type_match thy (T1, T2) =
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/TFL/post.ML	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/TFL/post.ML	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -128,7 +128,8 @@
   rule_by_tactic ctxt (REPEAT (FIRSTGOAL (resolve_tac ctxt [allI, impI, conjI] ORELSE' etac conjE)));
 
 (*Strip off the outer !P*)
-val spec'= Rule_Insts.read_instantiate @{context} [(("x", 0), "P::'b=>bool")] [] spec;
+val spec'=
+  Rule_Insts.read_instantiate @{context} [((("x", 0), Position.none), "P::'b=>bool")] [] spec;
 
 fun tracing true _ = ()
   | tracing false msg = writeln msg;
--- a/src/HOL/UNITY/UNITY_tactics.ML	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/UNITY/UNITY_tactics.ML	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@
       (*now there are two subgoals: co & transient*)
       simp_tac (ctxt addsimps [@{thm mk_total_program_def}]) 2,
       res_inst_tac ctxt
-        [(("act", 0), sact)] @{thm totalize_transientI} 2
+        [((("act", 0), Position.none), sact)] @{thm totalize_transientI} 2
       ORELSE res_inst_tac ctxt
-        [(("act", 0), sact)] @{thm transientI} 2,
+        [((("act", 0), Position.none), sact)] @{thm transientI} 2,
          (*simplify the command's domain*)
       simp_tac (ctxt addsimps @{thms Domain_unfold}) 3,
       constrains_tac ctxt 1,
--- a/src/LCF/LCF.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/LCF/LCF.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@
 method_setup induct = {*
   Scan.lift Args.name_inner_syntax >> (fn v => fn ctxt =>
     SIMPLE_METHOD' (fn i =>
-      res_inst_tac ctxt [(("f", 0), v)] @{thm induct} i THEN
+      res_inst_tac ctxt [((("f", 0), Position.none), v)] @{thm induct} i THEN
       REPEAT (resolve_tac ctxt @{thms adm_lemmas} i)))
 *}
 
@@ -380,7 +380,8 @@
 
 ML {*
 fun induct2_tac ctxt (f, g) i =
-  res_inst_tac ctxt [(("f", 0), f), (("g", 0), g)] @{thm induct2} i THEN
+  res_inst_tac ctxt
+    [((("f", 0), Position.none), f), ((("g", 0), Position.none), g)] @{thm induct2} i THEN
   REPEAT(resolve_tac ctxt @{thms adm_lemmas} i)
 *}
 
--- a/src/Pure/Tools/rule_insts.ML	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/Tools/rule_insts.ML	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -6,11 +6,16 @@
 
 signature BASIC_RULE_INSTS =
 sig
-  val res_inst_tac: Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic
-  val eres_inst_tac: Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic
-  val cut_inst_tac: Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic
-  val forw_inst_tac: Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic
-  val dres_inst_tac: Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic
+  val res_inst_tac: Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic
+  val eres_inst_tac: Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic
+  val cut_inst_tac: Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic
+  val forw_inst_tac: Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic
+  val dres_inst_tac: Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic
   val thin_tac: Proof.context -> string -> int -> tactic
   val subgoal_tac: Proof.context -> string -> int -> tactic
 end;
@@ -18,14 +23,18 @@
 signature RULE_INSTS =
 sig
   include BASIC_RULE_INSTS
-  val where_rule: Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list ->
+  val where_rule: Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list ->
     (binding * string option * mixfix) list -> thm -> thm
   val of_rule: Proof.context -> string option list * string option list ->
     (binding * string option * mixfix) list -> thm -> thm
-  val read_instantiate: Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> string list -> thm -> thm
-  val instantiate_tac: Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> string list -> tactic
+  val read_instantiate: Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> string list -> thm -> thm
+  val instantiate_tac: Proof.context ->
+    ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> string list -> tactic
   val make_elim_preserve: Proof.context -> thm -> thm
-  val method: (Proof.context -> (indexname * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic) ->
+  val method:
+    (Proof.context -> ((indexname * Position.T) * string) list -> thm -> int -> tactic) ->
     (Proof.context -> thm list -> int -> tactic) -> (Proof.context -> Proof.method) context_parser
 end;
 
@@ -34,21 +43,22 @@
 
 (** reading instantiations **)
 
-val partition_insts = List.partition (fn ((x, _), _) => String.isPrefix "'" x);
+val partition_insts = List.partition (fn (((x, _), _), _) => String.isPrefix "'" x);
+
+fun error_var msg (xi, pos) =
+  error (msg ^ quote (Term.string_of_vname xi) ^ Position.here pos);
 
 local
 
-fun error_var msg xi = error (msg ^ quote (Term.string_of_vname xi));
-
-fun the_sort tvars (xi: indexname) =
+fun the_sort tvars (xi, pos) : sort =
   (case AList.lookup (op =) tvars xi of
     SOME S => S
-  | NONE => error_var "No such type variable in theorem: " xi);
+  | NONE => error_var "No such type variable in theorem: " (xi, pos));
 
-fun the_type vars (xi: indexname) =
+fun the_type vars (xi, pos) : typ =
   (case AList.lookup (op =) vars xi of
     SOME T => T
-  | NONE => error_var "No such variable in theorem: " xi);
+  | NONE => error_var "No such variable in theorem: " (xi, pos));
 
 fun instantiate inst =
   Term_Subst.instantiate ([], map (fn (xi, t) => ((xi, Term.fastype_of t), t)) inst) #>
@@ -89,13 +99,13 @@
 
     (* type instantiations *)
 
-    fun readT (xi, s) =
+    fun readT ((xi, pos), s) =
       let
-        val S = the_sort tvars xi;
+        val S = the_sort tvars (xi, pos);
         val T = Syntax.read_typ ctxt s;
       in
         if Sign.of_sort thy (T, S) then ((xi, S), T)
-        else error_var "Incompatible sort for typ instantiation of " xi
+        else error_var "Incompatible sort for typ instantiation of " (xi, pos)
       end;
 
     val instT1 = Term_Subst.instantiateT (map readT type_insts);
@@ -110,7 +120,7 @@
 
     val instT2 = Term.typ_subst_TVars inferred;
     val vars2 = map (apsnd instT2) vars1;
-    val inst2 = instantiate (xs ~~ ts);
+    val inst2 = instantiate (map #1 xs ~~ ts);
 
 
     (* result *)
@@ -140,7 +150,7 @@
   let
     fun zip_vars _ [] = []
       | zip_vars (_ :: xs) (NONE :: rest) = zip_vars xs rest
-      | zip_vars ((x, _) :: xs) (SOME t :: rest) = (x, t) :: zip_vars xs rest
+      | zip_vars ((x, _) :: xs) (SOME t :: rest) = ((x, Position.none), t) :: zip_vars xs rest
       | zip_vars [] _ = error "More instantiations than variables in theorem";
     val insts =
       zip_vars (rev (Term.add_vars (Thm.full_prop_of thm) [])) args @
@@ -167,9 +177,9 @@
 val _ = Theory.setup
   (Attrib.setup @{binding "where"}
     (Scan.lift
-      (Parse.and_list (Args.var -- (Args.$$$ "=" |-- Args.name_inner_syntax)) -- Parse.for_fixes) >>
-      (fn (insts, fixes) =>
-        Thm.rule_attribute (fn context => where_rule (Context.proof_of context) insts fixes)))
+      (Parse.and_list (Parse.position Args.var -- (Args.$$$ "=" |-- Args.name_inner_syntax))
+        -- Parse.for_fixes) >> (fn (insts, fixes) =>
+          Thm.rule_attribute (fn context => where_rule (Context.proof_of context) insts fixes)))
     "named instantiation of theorem");
 
 
@@ -220,29 +230,29 @@
 
     (* process type insts: Tinsts_env *)
 
-    fun absent xi =
-      error ("No such variable in theorem: " ^ Term.string_of_vname xi);
-
     val (rtypes, rsorts) = Drule.types_sorts thm;
-    fun readT (xi, s) =
+    fun readT ((xi, pos), s) =
       let
-        val S = (case rsorts xi of SOME S => S | NONE => absent xi);
+        val S =
+          (case rsorts xi of
+            SOME S => S
+          | NONE => error_var "No such type variable in theorem: " (xi, pos));
         val T = Syntax.read_typ ctxt' s;
         val U = TVar (xi, S);
       in
         if Sign.typ_instance thy (T, U) then (U, T)
-        else error ("Instantiation of " ^ Term.string_of_vname xi ^ " fails")
+        else error_var "Cannot instantiate: " (xi, pos)
       end;
     val Tinsts_env = map readT Tinsts;
 
 
     (* preprocess rule: extract vars and their types, apply Tinsts *)
 
-    fun get_typ xi =
+    fun get_typ (xi, pos) =
       (case rtypes xi of
         SOME T => typ_subst_atomic Tinsts_env T
-      | NONE => absent xi);
-    val (xis, ss) = Library.split_list tinsts;
+      | NONE => error_var "No such variable in theorem: " (xi, pos) xi);
+    val (xis, ss) = split_list tinsts;
     val Ts = map get_typ xis;
 
     val (ts, envT) =
@@ -250,7 +260,7 @@
     val envT' =
       map (fn (xi, T) => (TVar (xi, the (rsorts xi)), T)) envT @ Tinsts_env;
     val cenv =
-      map (fn (xi, t) => apply2 (Thm.cterm_of ctxt') (Var (xi, fastype_of t), t))
+      map (fn ((xi, _), t) => apply2 (Thm.cterm_of ctxt') (Var (xi, fastype_of t), t))
         (distinct
           (fn ((x1, t1), (x2, t2)) => x1 = x2 andalso t1 aconv t2)
           (xis ~~ ts));
@@ -312,10 +322,12 @@
 (* derived tactics *)
 
 (*deletion of an assumption*)
-fun thin_tac ctxt s = eres_inst_tac ctxt [(("V", 0), s)] Drule.thin_rl;
+fun thin_tac ctxt s =
+  eres_inst_tac ctxt [((("V", 0), Position.none), s)] Drule.thin_rl;
 
 (*Introduce the given proposition as lemma and subgoal*)
-fun subgoal_tac ctxt A = DETERM o res_inst_tac ctxt [(("psi", 0), A)] cut_rl;
+fun subgoal_tac ctxt A =
+  DETERM o res_inst_tac ctxt [((("psi", 0), Position.none), A)] cut_rl;
 
 
 
@@ -324,8 +336,8 @@
 fun method inst_tac tac =
   Args.goal_spec --
   Scan.optional (Scan.lift
-    (Parse.and_list1 (Args.var -- (Args.$$$ "=" |-- Parse.!!! Args.name_inner_syntax)) --|
-      Args.$$$ "in")) [] --
+    (Parse.and_list1 (Parse.position Args.var -- (Args.$$$ "=" |-- Parse.!!! Args.name_inner_syntax))
+      --| Args.$$$ "in")) [] --
   Attrib.thms >>
   (fn ((quant, insts), thms) => fn ctxt => METHOD (fn facts =>
     if null insts then quant (Method.insert_tac facts THEN' tac ctxt thms)
--- a/src/Sequents/LK0.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Sequents/LK0.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -153,11 +153,11 @@
 ML {*
 (*Cut and thin, replacing the right-side formula*)
 fun cutR_tac ctxt s i =
-  res_inst_tac ctxt [(("P", 0), s) ] @{thm cut} i  THEN  rtac @{thm thinR} i
+  res_inst_tac ctxt [((("P", 0), Position.none), s) ] @{thm cut} i  THEN  rtac @{thm thinR} i
 
 (*Cut and thin, replacing the left-side formula*)
 fun cutL_tac ctxt s i =
-  res_inst_tac ctxt [(("P", 0), s)] @{thm cut} i  THEN  rtac @{thm thinL} (i+1)
+  res_inst_tac ctxt [((("P", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm cut} i  THEN  rtac @{thm thinL} (i+1)
 *}
 
 
--- a/src/Tools/induct_tacs.ML	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/induct_tacs.ML	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
       (case Induct.vars_of (Thm.term_of (Thm.cprem_of rule 1)) of
         Var (xi, _) :: _ => xi
       | _ => raise THM ("Malformed cases rule", 0, [rule]));
-  in res_inst_tac ctxt [(xi, s)] rule i st end
+  in res_inst_tac ctxt [((xi, Position.none), s)] rule i st end
   handle THM _ => Seq.empty;
 
 fun case_tac ctxt s = gen_case_tac ctxt s NONE;
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
 
 local
 
-fun prep_var (Var (ixn, _), SOME x) = SOME (ixn, x)
+fun prep_var (Var (xi, _), SOME x) = SOME ((xi, Position.none), x)
   | prep_var _ = NONE;
 
 fun prep_inst (concl, xs) =
--- a/src/ZF/Tools/induct_tacs.ML	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/ZF/Tools/induct_tacs.ML	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
              [] => error "induction is not available for this datatype"
            | major::_ => FOLogic.dest_Trueprop major)
   in
-    eres_inst_tac ctxt [(ixn, var)] rule i
+    eres_inst_tac ctxt [((ixn, Position.none), var)] rule i
   end
   handle Find_tname msg =>
             if exh then (*try boolean case analysis instead*)
--- a/src/ZF/UNITY/SubstAx.thy	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/ZF/UNITY/SubstAx.thy	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@
                                   @{thm EnsuresI}, @{thm ensuresI}] 1),
             (*now there are two subgoals: co & transient*)
             simp_tac (ctxt addsimps (Named_Theorems.get ctxt @{named_theorems program})) 2,
-            res_inst_tac ctxt [(("act", 0), sact)] @{thm transientI} 2,
+            res_inst_tac ctxt [((("act", 0), Position.none), sact)] @{thm transientI} 2,
                (*simplify the command's domain*)
             simp_tac (ctxt addsimps [@{thm domain_def}]) 3,
             (* proving the domain part *)
--- a/src/ZF/ind_syntax.ML	Thu Mar 19 17:25:57 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/ZF/ind_syntax.ML	Thu Mar 19 22:30:57 2015 +0100
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
 (*For deriving cases rules.  CollectD2 discards the domain, which is redundant;
   read_instantiate replaces a propositional variable by a formula variable*)
 val equals_CollectD =
-    Rule_Insts.read_instantiate @{context} [(("W", 0), "Q")] ["Q"]
+    Rule_Insts.read_instantiate @{context} [((("W", 0), Position.none), "Q")] ["Q"]
         (make_elim (@{thm equalityD1} RS @{thm subsetD} RS @{thm CollectD2}));