Theory Continuum_Not_Denumerable

(*  Title:      HOL/Analysis/Continuum_Not_Denumerable.thy
    Author:     Benjamin Porter, Monash University, NICTA, 2005
    Author:     Johannes Hölzl, TU München

section ‹Non-Denumerability of the Continuum›

theory Continuum_Not_Denumerable

subsection‹tag unimportant› ‹Abstract›

text ‹
  The following document presents a proof that the Continuum is uncountable.
  It is formalised in the Isabelle/Isar theorem proving system.

  ‹Theorem:› The Continuum ℝ› is not denumerable. In other words, there does
  not exist a function f: ℕ ⇒ ℝ› such that f› is surjective.

  ‹Outline:› An elegant informal proof of this result uses Cantor's
  Diagonalisation argument. The proof presented here is not this one.

  First we formalise some properties of closed intervals, then we prove the
  Nested Interval Property. This property relies on the completeness of the
  Real numbers and is the foundation for our argument. Informally it states
  that an intersection of countable closed intervals (where each successive
  interval is a subset of the last) is non-empty. We then assume a surjective
  function f: ℕ ⇒ ℝ› exists and find a real x› such that x› is not in the
  range of f› by generating a sequence of closed intervals then using the
  Nested Interval Property.
text‹tag important› ‹%whitespace›
theorem real_non_denum: "f :: nat  real. surj f"
  assume "f::nat  real. surj f"
  then obtain f :: "nat  real" where "surj f" ..

  txt ‹First we construct a sequence of nested intervals, ignoring term‹range f.›

  have "a < b  ka kb. ka < kb  {ka..kb}  {a..b}  c  {ka..kb}" for a b c :: real
    by (auto simp add: not_le cong: conj_cong)
      (metis dense le_less_linear less_linear less_trans order_refl)
  then obtain i j where ij:
    "a < b  i a b c < j a b c"
      "a < b  {i a b c .. j a b c}  {a .. b}"
      "a < b  c  {i a b c .. j a b c}"
    for a b c :: real
    by metis

  define ivl where "ivl =
    rec_nat (f 0 + 1, f 0 + 2) (λn x. (i (fst x) (snd x) (f n), j (fst x) (snd x) (f n)))"
  define I where "I n = {fst (ivl n) .. snd (ivl n)}" for n

  have ivl [simp]:
    "ivl 0 = (f 0 + 1, f 0 + 2)"
    "n. ivl (Suc n) = (i (fst (ivl n)) (snd (ivl n)) (f n), j (fst (ivl n)) (snd (ivl n)) (f n))"
    unfolding ivl_def by simp_all

  txt ‹This is a decreasing sequence of non-empty intervals.›

  have less: "fst (ivl n) < snd (ivl n)" for n
    by (induct n) (auto intro!: ij)

  have "decseq I"
    unfolding I_def decseq_Suc_iff ivl fst_conv snd_conv
    by (intro ij allI less)

  txt ‹Now we apply the finite intersection property of compact sets.›

  have "I 0  (i. I i)  {}"
  proof (rule compact_imp_fip_image)
    fix S :: "nat set"
    assume fin: "finite S"
    have "{}  I (Max (insert 0 S))"
      unfolding I_def using less[of "Max (insert 0 S)"] by auto
    also have "I (Max (insert 0 S))  (iinsert 0 S. I i)"
      using fin decseqD[OF ‹decseq I, of _ "Max (insert 0 S)"]
      by (auto simp: Max_ge_iff)
    also have "(iinsert 0 S. I i) = I 0  (iS. I i)"
      by auto
    finally show "I 0  (iS. I i)  {}"
      by auto
  qed (auto simp: I_def)
  then obtain x where "x  I n" for n
    by blast
  moreover from ‹surj f obtain j where "x = f j"
    by blast
  ultimately have "f j  I (Suc j)"
    by blast
  with ij(3)[OF less] show False
    unfolding I_def ivl fst_conv snd_conv by auto

lemma uncountable_UNIV_real: "uncountable (UNIV :: real set)"
  using real_non_denum unfolding uncountable_def by auto

lemma bij_betw_open_intervals:
  fixes a b c d :: real
  assumes "a < b" "c < d"
  shows "f. bij_betw f {a<..<b} {c<..<d}"
proof -
  define f where "f a b c d x = (d - c)/(b - a) * (x - a) + c" for a b c d x :: real
    fix a b c d x :: real
    assume *: "a < b" "c < d" "a < x" "x < b"
    moreover from * have "(d - c) * (x - a) < (d - c) * (b - a)"
      by (intro mult_strict_left_mono) simp_all
    moreover from * have "0 < (d - c) * (x - a) / (b - a)"
      by simp
    ultimately have "f a b c d x < d" "c < f a b c d x"
      by (simp_all add: f_def field_simps)
  with assms have "bij_betw (f a b c d) {a<..<b} {c<..<d}"
    by (intro bij_betw_byWitness[where f'="f c d a b"]) (auto simp: f_def)
  then show ?thesis by auto

lemma bij_betw_tan: "bij_betw tan {-pi/2<..<pi/2} UNIV"
  using arctan_ubound by (intro bij_betw_byWitness[where f'=arctan]) (auto simp: arctan arctan_tan)

lemma uncountable_open_interval: "uncountable {a<..<b}  a < b" for a b :: real
  show "a < b" if "uncountable {a<..<b}"
    using uncountable_def that by force
  show "uncountable {a<..<b}" if "a < b"
  proof -
    obtain f where "bij_betw f {a <..< b} {-pi/2<..<pi/2}"
      using bij_betw_open_intervals[OF a < b, of "-pi/2" "pi/2"] by auto
    then show ?thesis
      by (metis bij_betw_tan uncountable_bij_betw uncountable_UNIV_real)

lemma uncountable_half_open_interval_1: "uncountable {a..<b}  a < b" for a b :: real
  apply auto
  using atLeastLessThan_empty_iff
  apply fastforce
  using uncountable_open_interval [of a b]
  apply (metis countable_Un_iff ivl_disj_un_singleton(3))

lemma uncountable_half_open_interval_2: "uncountable {a<..b}  a < b" for a b :: real
  apply auto
  using atLeastLessThan_empty_iff
  apply fastforce
  using uncountable_open_interval [of a b]
  apply (metis countable_Un_iff ivl_disj_un_singleton(4))

lemma real_interval_avoid_countable_set:
  fixes a b :: real and A :: "real set"
  assumes "a < b" and "countable A"
  shows "x{a<..<b}. x  A"
proof -
  from ‹countable A have *: "countable (A  {a<..<b})"
    by auto
  with a < b have "¬ countable {a<..<b}"
    by (simp add: uncountable_open_interval)
  with * have "A  {a<..<b}  {a<..<b}"
    by auto
  then have "A  {a<..<b}  {a<..<b}"
    by (intro psubsetI) auto
  then have "x. x  {a<..<b} - A  {a<..<b}"
    by (rule psubset_imp_ex_mem)
  then show ?thesis
    by auto

lemma uncountable_closed_interval: "uncountable {a..b}  a < b" for a b :: real
  apply (rule iffI)
   apply (metis atLeastAtMost_singleton atLeastatMost_empty countable_finite finite.emptyI finite_insert linorder_neqE_linordered_idom)
  using real_interval_avoid_countable_set by fastforce

lemma open_minus_countable:
  fixes S A :: "real set"
  assumes "countable A" "S  {}" "open S"
  shows "xS. x  A"
proof -
  obtain x where "x  S"
    using S  {} by auto
  then obtain e where "0 < e" "{y. dist y x < e}  S"
    using ‹open S by (auto simp: open_dist subset_eq)
  moreover have "{y. dist y x < e} = {x - e <..< x + e}"
    by (auto simp: dist_real_def)
  ultimately have "uncountable (S - A)"
    using uncountable_open_interval[of "x - e" "x + e"] ‹countable A
    by (intro uncountable_minus_countable) (auto dest: countable_subset)
  then show ?thesis
    unfolding uncountable_def by auto