src/HOL/Quotient.thy

remove needless Metis facts

(*  Title:      Quotient.thy
    Author:     Cezary Kaliszyk and Christian Urban
*)

header {* Definition of Quotient Types *}

theory Quotient
imports Plain Hilbert_Choice
uses
  ("Tools/Quotient/quotient_info.ML")
  ("Tools/Quotient/quotient_typ.ML")
  ("Tools/Quotient/quotient_def.ML")
  ("Tools/Quotient/quotient_term.ML")
  ("Tools/Quotient/quotient_tacs.ML")
begin


text {*
  Basic definition for equivalence relations
  that are represented by predicates.
*}

definition
  "equivp E \<equiv> \<forall>x y. E x y = (E x = E y)"

definition
  "reflp E \<equiv> \<forall>x. E x x"

definition
  "symp E \<equiv> \<forall>x y. E x y \<longrightarrow> E y x"

definition
  "transp E \<equiv> \<forall>x y z. E x y \<and> E y z \<longrightarrow> E x z"

lemma equivp_reflp_symp_transp:
  shows "equivp E = (reflp E \<and> symp E \<and> transp E)"
  unfolding equivp_def reflp_def symp_def transp_def fun_eq_iff
  by blast

lemma equivp_reflp:
  shows "equivp E \<Longrightarrow> E x x"
  by (simp only: equivp_reflp_symp_transp reflp_def)

lemma equivp_symp:
  shows "equivp E \<Longrightarrow> E x y \<Longrightarrow> E y x"
  by (metis equivp_reflp_symp_transp symp_def)

lemma equivp_transp:
  shows "equivp E \<Longrightarrow> E x y \<Longrightarrow> E y z \<Longrightarrow> E x z"
  by (metis equivp_reflp_symp_transp transp_def)

lemma equivpI:
  assumes "reflp R" "symp R" "transp R"
  shows "equivp R"
  using assms by (simp add: equivp_reflp_symp_transp)

lemma identity_equivp:
  shows "equivp (op =)"
  unfolding equivp_def
  by auto

text {* Partial equivalences *}

definition
  "part_equivp E \<equiv> (\<exists>x. E x x) \<and> (\<forall>x y. E x y = (E x x \<and> E y y \<and> (E x = E y)))"

lemma equivp_implies_part_equivp:
  assumes a: "equivp E"
  shows "part_equivp E"
  using a
  unfolding equivp_def part_equivp_def
  by auto

lemma part_equivp_symp:
  assumes e: "part_equivp R"
  and a: "R x y"
  shows "R y x"
  using e[simplified part_equivp_def] a
  by (metis)

lemma part_equivp_typedef:
  shows "part_equivp R \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>d. d \<in> (\<lambda>c. \<exists>x. R x x \<and> c = R x)"
  unfolding part_equivp_def mem_def
  apply clarify
  apply (intro exI)
  apply (rule conjI)
  apply assumption
  apply (rule refl)
  done

text {* Composition of Relations *}

abbreviation
  rel_conj (infixr "OOO" 75)
where
  "r1 OOO r2 \<equiv> r1 OO r2 OO r1"

lemma eq_comp_r:
  shows "((op =) OOO R) = R"
  by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff)

subsection {* Respects predicate *}

definition
  Respects
where
  "Respects R x \<equiv> R x x"

lemma in_respects:
  shows "(x \<in> Respects R) = R x x"
  unfolding mem_def Respects_def
  by simp

subsection {* Function map and function relation *}

definition
  fun_map (infixr "--->" 55)
where
[simp]: "fun_map f g h x = g (h (f x))"

definition
  fun_rel (infixr "===>" 55)
where
[simp]: "fun_rel E1 E2 f g = (\<forall>x y. E1 x y \<longrightarrow> E2 (f x) (g y))"

lemma fun_relI [intro]:
  assumes "\<And>a b. P a b \<Longrightarrow> Q (x a) (y b)"
  shows "(P ===> Q) x y"
  using assms by (simp add: fun_rel_def)

lemma fun_map_id:
  shows "(id ---> id) = id"
  by (simp add: fun_eq_iff id_def)

lemma fun_rel_eq:
  shows "((op =) ===> (op =)) = (op =)"
  by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)


subsection {* Quotient Predicate *}

definition
  "Quotient E Abs Rep \<equiv>
     (\<forall>a. Abs (Rep a) = a) \<and> (\<forall>a. E (Rep a) (Rep a)) \<and>
     (\<forall>r s. E r s = (E r r \<and> E s s \<and> (Abs r = Abs s)))"

lemma Quotient_abs_rep:
  assumes a: "Quotient E Abs Rep"
  shows "Abs (Rep a) = a"
  using a
  unfolding Quotient_def
  by simp

lemma Quotient_rep_reflp:
  assumes a: "Quotient E Abs Rep"
  shows "E (Rep a) (Rep a)"
  using a
  unfolding Quotient_def
  by blast

lemma Quotient_rel:
  assumes a: "Quotient E Abs Rep"
  shows " E r s = (E r r \<and> E s s \<and> (Abs r = Abs s))"
  using a
  unfolding Quotient_def
  by blast

lemma Quotient_rel_rep:
  assumes a: "Quotient R Abs Rep"
  shows "R (Rep a) (Rep b) = (a = b)"
  using a
  unfolding Quotient_def
  by metis

lemma Quotient_rep_abs:
  assumes a: "Quotient R Abs Rep"
  shows "R r r \<Longrightarrow> R (Rep (Abs r)) r"
  using a unfolding Quotient_def
  by blast

lemma Quotient_rel_abs:
  assumes a: "Quotient E Abs Rep"
  shows "E r s \<Longrightarrow> Abs r = Abs s"
  using a unfolding Quotient_def
  by blast

lemma Quotient_symp:
  assumes a: "Quotient E Abs Rep"
  shows "symp E"
  using a unfolding Quotient_def symp_def
  by metis

lemma Quotient_transp:
  assumes a: "Quotient E Abs Rep"
  shows "transp E"
  using a unfolding Quotient_def transp_def
  by metis

lemma identity_quotient:
  shows "Quotient (op =) id id"
  unfolding Quotient_def id_def
  by blast

lemma fun_quotient:
  assumes q1: "Quotient R1 abs1 rep1"
  and     q2: "Quotient R2 abs2 rep2"
  shows "Quotient (R1 ===> R2) (rep1 ---> abs2) (abs1 ---> rep2)"
proof -
  have "\<forall>a. (rep1 ---> abs2) ((abs1 ---> rep2) a) = a"
    using q1 q2
    unfolding Quotient_def
    unfolding fun_eq_iff
    by simp
  moreover
  have "\<forall>a. (R1 ===> R2) ((abs1 ---> rep2) a) ((abs1 ---> rep2) a)"
    using q1 q2
    unfolding Quotient_def
    by (simp (no_asm)) (metis)
  moreover
  have "\<forall>r s. (R1 ===> R2) r s = ((R1 ===> R2) r r \<and> (R1 ===> R2) s s \<and>
        (rep1 ---> abs2) r  = (rep1 ---> abs2) s)"
    unfolding fun_eq_iff
    apply(auto)
    using q1 q2 unfolding Quotient_def
    apply(metis)
    using q1 q2 unfolding Quotient_def
    apply(metis)
    using q1 q2 unfolding Quotient_def
    apply(metis)
    using q1 q2 unfolding Quotient_def
    apply(metis)
    done
  ultimately
  show "Quotient (R1 ===> R2) (rep1 ---> abs2) (abs1 ---> rep2)"
    unfolding Quotient_def by blast
qed

lemma abs_o_rep:
  assumes a: "Quotient R Abs Rep"
  shows "Abs o Rep = id"
  unfolding fun_eq_iff
  by (simp add: Quotient_abs_rep[OF a])

lemma equals_rsp:
  assumes q: "Quotient R Abs Rep"
  and     a: "R xa xb" "R ya yb"
  shows "R xa ya = R xb yb"
  using a Quotient_symp[OF q] Quotient_transp[OF q]
  unfolding symp_def transp_def
  by blast

lemma lambda_prs:
  assumes q1: "Quotient R1 Abs1 Rep1"
  and     q2: "Quotient R2 Abs2 Rep2"
  shows "(Rep1 ---> Abs2) (\<lambda>x. Rep2 (f (Abs1 x))) = (\<lambda>x. f x)"
  unfolding fun_eq_iff
  using Quotient_abs_rep[OF q1] Quotient_abs_rep[OF q2]
  by simp

lemma lambda_prs1:
  assumes q1: "Quotient R1 Abs1 Rep1"
  and     q2: "Quotient R2 Abs2 Rep2"
  shows "(Rep1 ---> Abs2) (\<lambda>x. (Abs1 ---> Rep2) f x) = (\<lambda>x. f x)"
  unfolding fun_eq_iff
  using Quotient_abs_rep[OF q1] Quotient_abs_rep[OF q2]
  by simp

lemma rep_abs_rsp:
  assumes q: "Quotient R Abs Rep"
  and     a: "R x1 x2"
  shows "R x1 (Rep (Abs x2))"
  using a Quotient_rel[OF q] Quotient_abs_rep[OF q] Quotient_rep_reflp[OF q]
  by metis

lemma rep_abs_rsp_left:
  assumes q: "Quotient R Abs Rep"
  and     a: "R x1 x2"
  shows "R (Rep (Abs x1)) x2"
  using a Quotient_rel[OF q] Quotient_abs_rep[OF q] Quotient_rep_reflp[OF q]
  by metis

text{*
  In the following theorem R1 can be instantiated with anything,
  but we know some of the types of the Rep and Abs functions;
  so by solving Quotient assumptions we can get a unique R1 that
  will be provable; which is why we need to use @{text apply_rsp} and
  not the primed version *}

lemma apply_rsp:
  fixes f g::"'a \<Rightarrow> 'c"
  assumes q: "Quotient R1 Abs1 Rep1"
  and     a: "(R1 ===> R2) f g" "R1 x y"
  shows "R2 (f x) (g y)"
  using a by simp

lemma apply_rsp':
  assumes a: "(R1 ===> R2) f g" "R1 x y"
  shows "R2 (f x) (g y)"
  using a by simp

subsection {* lemmas for regularisation of ball and bex *}

lemma ball_reg_eqv:
  fixes P :: "'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
  assumes a: "equivp R"
  shows "Ball (Respects R) P = (All P)"
  using a
  unfolding equivp_def
  by (auto simp add: in_respects)

lemma bex_reg_eqv:
  fixes P :: "'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
  assumes a: "equivp R"
  shows "Bex (Respects R) P = (Ex P)"
  using a
  unfolding equivp_def
  by (auto simp add: in_respects)

lemma ball_reg_right:
  assumes a: "\<And>x. R x \<Longrightarrow> P x \<longrightarrow> Q x"
  shows "All P \<longrightarrow> Ball R Q"
  using a by (metis Collect_def Collect_mem_eq)

lemma bex_reg_left:
  assumes a: "\<And>x. R x \<Longrightarrow> Q x \<longrightarrow> P x"
  shows "Bex R Q \<longrightarrow> Ex P"
  using a by (metis Collect_def Collect_mem_eq)

lemma ball_reg_left:
  assumes a: "equivp R"
  shows "(\<And>x. (Q x \<longrightarrow> P x)) \<Longrightarrow> Ball (Respects R) Q \<longrightarrow> All P"
  using a by (metis equivp_reflp in_respects)

lemma bex_reg_right:
  assumes a: "equivp R"
  shows "(\<And>x. (Q x \<longrightarrow> P x)) \<Longrightarrow> Ex Q \<longrightarrow> Bex (Respects R) P"
  using a by (metis equivp_reflp in_respects)

lemma ball_reg_eqv_range:
  fixes P::"'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
  and x::"'a"
  assumes a: "equivp R2"
  shows   "(Ball (Respects (R1 ===> R2)) (\<lambda>f. P (f x)) = All (\<lambda>f. P (f x)))"
  apply(rule iffI)
  apply(rule allI)
  apply(drule_tac x="\<lambda>y. f x" in bspec)
  apply(simp add: in_respects)
  apply(rule impI)
  using a equivp_reflp_symp_transp[of "R2"]
  apply(simp add: reflp_def)
  apply(simp)
  apply(simp)
  done

lemma bex_reg_eqv_range:
  assumes a: "equivp R2"
  shows   "(Bex (Respects (R1 ===> R2)) (\<lambda>f. P (f x)) = Ex (\<lambda>f. P (f x)))"
  apply(auto)
  apply(rule_tac x="\<lambda>y. f x" in bexI)
  apply(simp)
  apply(simp add: Respects_def in_respects)
  apply(rule impI)
  using a equivp_reflp_symp_transp[of "R2"]
  apply(simp add: reflp_def)
  done

(* Next four lemmas are unused *)
lemma all_reg:
  assumes a: "!x :: 'a. (P x --> Q x)"
  and     b: "All P"
  shows "All Q"
  using a b by (metis)

lemma ex_reg:
  assumes a: "!x :: 'a. (P x --> Q x)"
  and     b: "Ex P"
  shows "Ex Q"
  using a b by metis

lemma ball_reg:
  assumes a: "!x :: 'a. (R x --> P x --> Q x)"
  and     b: "Ball R P"
  shows "Ball R Q"
  using a b by (metis Collect_def Collect_mem_eq)

lemma bex_reg:
  assumes a: "!x :: 'a. (R x --> P x --> Q x)"
  and     b: "Bex R P"
  shows "Bex R Q"
  using a b by (metis Collect_def Collect_mem_eq)


lemma ball_all_comm:
  assumes "\<And>y. (\<forall>x\<in>P. A x y) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>x. B x y)"
  shows "(\<forall>x\<in>P. \<forall>y. A x y) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>x. \<forall>y. B x y)"
  using assms by auto

lemma bex_ex_comm:
  assumes "(\<exists>y. \<exists>x. A x y) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>y. \<exists>x\<in>P. B x y)"
  shows "(\<exists>x. \<exists>y. A x y) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x\<in>P. \<exists>y. B x y)"
  using assms by auto

subsection {* Bounded abstraction *}

definition
  Babs :: "('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b"
where
  "x \<in> p \<Longrightarrow> Babs p m x = m x"

lemma babs_rsp:
  assumes q: "Quotient R1 Abs1 Rep1"
  and     a: "(R1 ===> R2) f g"
  shows      "(R1 ===> R2) (Babs (Respects R1) f) (Babs (Respects R1) g)"
  apply (auto simp add: Babs_def in_respects)
  apply (subgoal_tac "x \<in> Respects R1 \<and> y \<in> Respects R1")
  using a apply (simp add: Babs_def)
  apply (simp add: in_respects)
  using Quotient_rel[OF q]
  by metis

lemma babs_prs:
  assumes q1: "Quotient R1 Abs1 Rep1"
  and     q2: "Quotient R2 Abs2 Rep2"
  shows "((Rep1 ---> Abs2) (Babs (Respects R1) ((Abs1 ---> Rep2) f))) = f"
  apply (rule ext)
  apply (simp)
  apply (subgoal_tac "Rep1 x \<in> Respects R1")
  apply (simp add: Babs_def Quotient_abs_rep[OF q1] Quotient_abs_rep[OF q2])
  apply (simp add: in_respects Quotient_rel_rep[OF q1])
  done

lemma babs_simp:
  assumes q: "Quotient R1 Abs Rep"
  shows "((R1 ===> R2) (Babs (Respects R1) f) (Babs (Respects R1) g)) = ((R1 ===> R2) f g)"
  apply(rule iffI)
  apply(simp_all only: babs_rsp[OF q])
  apply(auto simp add: Babs_def)
  apply (subgoal_tac "x \<in> Respects R1 \<and> y \<in> Respects R1")
  apply(metis Babs_def)
  apply (simp add: in_respects)
  using Quotient_rel[OF q]
  by metis

(* If a user proves that a particular functional relation
   is an equivalence this may be useful in regularising *)
lemma babs_reg_eqv:
  shows "equivp R \<Longrightarrow> Babs (Respects R) P = P"
  by (simp add: fun_eq_iff Babs_def in_respects equivp_reflp)


(* 3 lemmas needed for proving repabs_inj *)
lemma ball_rsp:
  assumes a: "(R ===> (op =)) f g"
  shows "Ball (Respects R) f = Ball (Respects R) g"
  using a by (simp add: Ball_def in_respects)

lemma bex_rsp:
  assumes a: "(R ===> (op =)) f g"
  shows "(Bex (Respects R) f = Bex (Respects R) g)"
  using a by (simp add: Bex_def in_respects)

lemma bex1_rsp:
  assumes a: "(R ===> (op =)) f g"
  shows "Ex1 (\<lambda>x. x \<in> Respects R \<and> f x) = Ex1 (\<lambda>x. x \<in> Respects R \<and> g x)"
  using a
  by (simp add: Ex1_def in_respects) auto

(* 2 lemmas needed for cleaning of quantifiers *)
lemma all_prs:
  assumes a: "Quotient R absf repf"
  shows "Ball (Respects R) ((absf ---> id) f) = All f"
  using a unfolding Quotient_def Ball_def in_respects fun_map_def id_apply
  by metis

lemma ex_prs:
  assumes a: "Quotient R absf repf"
  shows "Bex (Respects R) ((absf ---> id) f) = Ex f"
  using a unfolding Quotient_def Bex_def in_respects fun_map_def id_apply
  by metis

subsection {* @{text Bex1_rel} quantifier *}

definition
  Bex1_rel :: "('a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
  "Bex1_rel R P \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x \<in> Respects R. P x) \<and> (\<forall>x \<in> Respects R. \<forall>y \<in> Respects R. ((P x \<and> P y) \<longrightarrow> (R x y)))"

lemma bex1_rel_aux:
  "\<lbrakk>\<forall>xa ya. R xa ya \<longrightarrow> x xa = y ya; Bex1_rel R x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Bex1_rel R y"
  unfolding Bex1_rel_def
  apply (erule conjE)+
  apply (erule bexE)
  apply rule
  apply (rule_tac x="xa" in bexI)
  apply metis
  apply metis
  apply rule+
  apply (erule_tac x="xaa" in ballE)
  prefer 2
  apply (metis)
  apply (erule_tac x="ya" in ballE)
  prefer 2
  apply (metis)
  apply (metis in_respects)
  done

lemma bex1_rel_aux2:
  "\<lbrakk>\<forall>xa ya. R xa ya \<longrightarrow> x xa = y ya; Bex1_rel R y\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Bex1_rel R x"
  unfolding Bex1_rel_def
  apply (erule conjE)+
  apply (erule bexE)
  apply rule
  apply (rule_tac x="xa" in bexI)
  apply metis
  apply metis
  apply rule+
  apply (erule_tac x="xaa" in ballE)
  prefer 2
  apply (metis)
  apply (erule_tac x="ya" in ballE)
  prefer 2
  apply (metis)
  apply (metis in_respects)
  done

lemma bex1_rel_rsp:
  assumes a: "Quotient R absf repf"
  shows "((R ===> op =) ===> op =) (Bex1_rel R) (Bex1_rel R)"
  apply simp
  apply clarify
  apply rule
  apply (simp_all add: bex1_rel_aux bex1_rel_aux2)
  apply (erule bex1_rel_aux2)
  apply assumption
  done


lemma ex1_prs:
  assumes a: "Quotient R absf repf"
  shows "((absf ---> id) ---> id) (Bex1_rel R) f = Ex1 f"
apply simp
apply (subst Bex1_rel_def)
apply (subst Bex_def)
apply (subst Ex1_def)
apply simp
apply rule
 apply (erule conjE)+
 apply (erule_tac exE)
 apply (erule conjE)
 apply (subgoal_tac "\<forall>y. R y y \<longrightarrow> f (absf y) \<longrightarrow> R x y")
  apply (rule_tac x="absf x" in exI)
  apply (simp)
  apply rule+
  using a unfolding Quotient_def
  apply metis
 apply rule+
 apply (erule_tac x="x" in ballE)
  apply (erule_tac x="y" in ballE)
   apply simp
  apply (simp add: in_respects)
 apply (simp add: in_respects)
apply (erule_tac exE)
 apply rule
 apply (rule_tac x="repf x" in exI)
 apply (simp only: in_respects)
  apply rule
 apply (metis Quotient_rel_rep[OF a])
using a unfolding Quotient_def apply (simp)
apply rule+
using a unfolding Quotient_def in_respects
apply metis
done

lemma bex1_bexeq_reg:
  shows "(\<exists>!x\<in>Respects R. P x) \<longrightarrow> (Bex1_rel R (\<lambda>x. P x))"
  apply (simp add: Ex1_def Bex1_rel_def in_respects)
  apply clarify
  apply auto
  apply (rule bexI)
  apply assumption
  apply (simp add: in_respects)
  apply (simp add: in_respects)
  apply auto
  done

lemma bex1_bexeq_reg_eqv:
  assumes a: "equivp R"
  shows "(\<exists>!x. P x) \<longrightarrow> Bex1_rel R P"
  using equivp_reflp[OF a]
  apply (intro impI)
  apply (elim ex1E)
  apply (rule mp[OF bex1_bexeq_reg])
  apply (rule_tac a="x" in ex1I)
  apply (subst in_respects)
  apply (rule conjI)
  apply assumption
  apply assumption
  apply clarify
  apply (erule_tac x="xa" in allE)
  apply simp
  done

subsection {* Various respects and preserve lemmas *}

lemma quot_rel_rsp:
  assumes a: "Quotient R Abs Rep"
  shows "(R ===> R ===> op =) R R"
  apply(rule fun_relI)+
  apply(rule equals_rsp[OF a])
  apply(assumption)+
  done

lemma o_prs:
  assumes q1: "Quotient R1 Abs1 Rep1"
  and     q2: "Quotient R2 Abs2 Rep2"
  and     q3: "Quotient R3 Abs3 Rep3"
  shows "((Abs2 ---> Rep3) ---> (Abs1 ---> Rep2) ---> (Rep1 ---> Abs3)) op \<circ> = op \<circ>"
  and   "(id ---> (Abs1 ---> id) ---> Rep1 ---> id) op \<circ> = op \<circ>"
  using Quotient_abs_rep[OF q1] Quotient_abs_rep[OF q2] Quotient_abs_rep[OF q3]
  unfolding o_def fun_eq_iff by simp_all

lemma o_rsp:
  "((R2 ===> R3) ===> (R1 ===> R2) ===> (R1 ===> R3)) op \<circ> op \<circ>"
  "(op = ===> (R1 ===> op =) ===> R1 ===> op =) op \<circ> op \<circ>"
  unfolding fun_rel_def o_def fun_eq_iff by auto

lemma cond_prs:
  assumes a: "Quotient R absf repf"
  shows "absf (if a then repf b else repf c) = (if a then b else c)"
  using a unfolding Quotient_def by auto

lemma if_prs:
  assumes q: "Quotient R Abs Rep"
  shows "(id ---> Rep ---> Rep ---> Abs) If = If"
  using Quotient_abs_rep[OF q]
  by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff)

lemma if_rsp:
  assumes q: "Quotient R Abs Rep"
  shows "(op = ===> R ===> R ===> R) If If"
  by auto

lemma let_prs:
  assumes q1: "Quotient R1 Abs1 Rep1"
  and     q2: "Quotient R2 Abs2 Rep2"
  shows "(Rep2 ---> (Abs2 ---> Rep1) ---> Abs1) Let = Let"
  using Quotient_abs_rep[OF q1] Quotient_abs_rep[OF q2]
  by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff)

lemma let_rsp:
  shows "(R1 ===> (R1 ===> R2) ===> R2) Let Let"
  by auto

lemma mem_rsp:
  shows "(R1 ===> (R1 ===> R2) ===> R2) op \<in> op \<in>"
  by (simp add: mem_def)

lemma mem_prs:
  assumes a1: "Quotient R1 Abs1 Rep1"
  and     a2: "Quotient R2 Abs2 Rep2"
  shows "(Rep1 ---> (Abs1 ---> Rep2) ---> Abs2) op \<in> = op \<in>"
  by (simp add: fun_eq_iff mem_def Quotient_abs_rep[OF a1] Quotient_abs_rep[OF a2])

lemma id_rsp:
  shows "(R ===> R) id id"
  by simp

lemma id_prs:
  assumes a: "Quotient R Abs Rep"
  shows "(Rep ---> Abs) id = id"
  unfolding fun_eq_iff
  by (simp add: Quotient_abs_rep[OF a])


locale quot_type =
  fixes R :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
  and   Abs :: "('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  and   Rep :: "'b \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> bool)"
  assumes equivp: "part_equivp R"
  and     rep_prop: "\<And>y. \<exists>x. R x x \<and> Rep y = R x"
  and     rep_inverse: "\<And>x. Abs (Rep x) = x"
  and     abs_inverse: "\<And>c. (\<exists>x. ((R x x) \<and> (c = R x))) \<Longrightarrow> (Rep (Abs c)) = c"
  and     rep_inject: "\<And>x y. (Rep x = Rep y) = (x = y)"
begin

definition
  abs::"'a \<Rightarrow> 'b"
where
  "abs x \<equiv> Abs (R x)"

definition
  rep::"'b \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where
  "rep a = Eps (Rep a)"

lemma homeier5:
  assumes a: "R r r"
  shows "Rep (Abs (R r)) = R r"
  apply (subst abs_inverse)
  using a by auto

theorem homeier6:
  assumes a: "R r r"
  and b: "R s s"
  shows "Abs (R r) = Abs (R s) \<longleftrightarrow> R r = R s"
  by (metis a b homeier5)

theorem homeier8:
  assumes "R r r"
  shows "R (Eps (R r)) = R r"
  using assms equivp[simplified part_equivp_def]
  apply clarify
  by (metis assms exE_some)

lemma Quotient:
  shows "Quotient R abs rep"
  unfolding Quotient_def abs_def rep_def
  proof (intro conjI allI)
    fix a r s
    show "Abs (R (Eps (Rep a))) = a"
      by (metis equivp exE_some part_equivp_def rep_inverse rep_prop)
    show "R r s \<longleftrightarrow> R r r \<and> R s s \<and> (Abs (R r) = Abs (R s))"
      by (metis homeier6 equivp[simplified part_equivp_def])
    show "R (Eps (Rep a)) (Eps (Rep a))" proof -
      obtain x where r: "R x x" and rep: "Rep a = R x" using rep_prop[of a] by auto
      have "R (Eps (R x)) x" using homeier8 r by simp
      then have "R x (Eps (R x))" using part_equivp_symp[OF equivp] by fast
      then have "R (Eps (R x)) (Eps (R x))" using homeier8[OF r] by simp
      then show "R (Eps (Rep a)) (Eps (Rep a))" using rep by simp
    qed
  qed

end


subsection {* ML setup *}

text {* Auxiliary data for the quotient package *}

use "Tools/Quotient/quotient_info.ML"

declare [[map "fun" = (fun_map, fun_rel)]]

lemmas [quot_thm] = fun_quotient
lemmas [quot_respect] = quot_rel_rsp if_rsp o_rsp let_rsp mem_rsp id_rsp
lemmas [quot_preserve] = if_prs o_prs let_prs mem_prs id_prs
lemmas [quot_equiv] = identity_equivp


text {* Lemmas about simplifying id's. *}
lemmas [id_simps] =
  id_def[symmetric]
  fun_map_id
  id_apply
  id_o
  o_id
  eq_comp_r

text {* Translation functions for the lifting process. *}
use "Tools/Quotient/quotient_term.ML"


text {* Definitions of the quotient types. *}
use "Tools/Quotient/quotient_typ.ML"


text {* Definitions for quotient constants. *}
use "Tools/Quotient/quotient_def.ML"


text {*
  An auxiliary constant for recording some information
  about the lifted theorem in a tactic.
*}
definition
  "Quot_True (x :: 'a) \<equiv> True"

lemma
  shows QT_all: "Quot_True (All P) \<Longrightarrow> Quot_True P"
  and   QT_ex:  "Quot_True (Ex P) \<Longrightarrow> Quot_True P"
  and   QT_ex1: "Quot_True (Ex1 P) \<Longrightarrow> Quot_True P"
  and   QT_lam: "Quot_True (\<lambda>x. P x) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. Quot_True (P x))"
  and   QT_ext: "(\<And>x. Quot_True (a x) \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x) \<Longrightarrow> (Quot_True a \<Longrightarrow> f = g)"
  by (simp_all add: Quot_True_def ext)

lemma QT_imp: "Quot_True a \<equiv> Quot_True b"
  by (simp add: Quot_True_def)


text {* Tactics for proving the lifted theorems *}
use "Tools/Quotient/quotient_tacs.ML"

subsection {* Methods / Interface *}

method_setup lifting =
  {* Attrib.thms >> (fn thms => fn ctxt => 
       SIMPLE_METHOD (HEADGOAL (Quotient_Tacs.lift_tac ctxt [] thms))) *}
  {* lifts theorems to quotient types *}

method_setup lifting_setup =
  {* Attrib.thm >> (fn thm => fn ctxt => 
       SIMPLE_METHOD (HEADGOAL (Quotient_Tacs.lift_procedure_tac ctxt [] thm))) *}
  {* sets up the three goals for the quotient lifting procedure *}

method_setup descending =
  {* Scan.succeed (fn ctxt => SIMPLE_METHOD (HEADGOAL (Quotient_Tacs.descend_tac ctxt []))) *}
  {* decends theorems to the raw level *}

method_setup descending_setup =
  {* Scan.succeed (fn ctxt => SIMPLE_METHOD (HEADGOAL (Quotient_Tacs.descend_procedure_tac ctxt []))) *}
  {* sets up the three goals for the decending theorems *}

method_setup regularize =
  {* Scan.succeed (fn ctxt => SIMPLE_METHOD (HEADGOAL (Quotient_Tacs.regularize_tac ctxt))) *}
  {* proves the regularization goals from the quotient lifting procedure *}

method_setup injection =
  {* Scan.succeed (fn ctxt => SIMPLE_METHOD (HEADGOAL (Quotient_Tacs.all_injection_tac ctxt))) *}
  {* proves the rep/abs injection goals from the quotient lifting procedure *}

method_setup cleaning =
  {* Scan.succeed (fn ctxt => SIMPLE_METHOD (HEADGOAL (Quotient_Tacs.clean_tac ctxt))) *}
  {* proves the cleaning goals from the quotient lifting procedure *}

attribute_setup quot_lifted =
  {* Scan.succeed Quotient_Tacs.lifted_attrib *}
  {* lifts theorems to quotient types *}

no_notation
  rel_conj (infixr "OOO" 75) and
  fun_map (infixr "--->" 55) and
  fun_rel (infixr "===>" 55)

end